THINKING ANGLICANS

CofE pensions crisis: more coverage

Some press reports of the recent announcements:

Church Times last week had: C of E faces new £36-million pensions squeeze

Church of England Newspaper this week has a feature article by Bishop John Packer Facing up to the pensions crisis.

The Church of England website has, in addition to the documents linked here previously has more items:

An article designed for parish magazines, which can be downloaded as an RTF file, or read here below the fold.

The Powerpoint slides used at the General Synod presentation in February can be downloaded.

You can listen to the audio recording of that presentation here.

If you want to know more about how the clergy pension scheme works from the member’s viewpoint, you need to download as a PDF the booklet Your Pension Questions Answered . Other material is available from the links on the right hand side of this page.

Article for use by parish magazines

By Shaun Farrell, Secretary, the Church of England Pensions Board

In common with private companies and public bodies, the Church of England is reviewing its pensions policy. No decisions have been taken and none will be taken until the General Synod debates them and that will not be before next year.

Like all other defined benefit pension schemes, the Church’s pension schemes are under pressure. They are being squeezed because of the long-term reduction in returns from investments, and the increasing life expectancy of members. On top of that, new Government regulations designed to make pension schemes more secure for their members are also likely to increase the cost of the Church’s schemes.

The new regulations and code of practice result from the Pensions Act 2004 and substantially change the way in which schemes have to assess their assets and liabilities. They require pensions funds to take a more cautious view of likely investment returns and to adopt an investment policy that attempts to reduce risk still further. They also stipulate that deficits in pensions funds should be made good more quickly than before.

The Archbishops of Canterbury and York set up a task group to look at the impact on pensions. Its report sets out the issues facing the Church and starts a wide consultation ahead of any decisions. The report is published in full on the Church of England’s website, www.cofe.anglican.org, with a link, Pensions update, to all the relevant documents.

The key questions tabled by the task group were:

  • Is the Church’s commitment to the clergy pension scheme in its present form such that it is willing and able to find the additional money to fund it, however high the future contribution rate might have to be, or is there an overall cost beyond which it would not be practicable or desirable to go?
  • What changes in pension entitlement for the future service of existing members of the clergy should be contemplated if some cost reduction proves unavoidable?
  • Should the present clergy scheme be closed to new entrants and less expensive pension arrangements be introduced for them?
  • Should increases in pensions be linked in future to increases in prices rather than in stipends (as they are at present)? Without recreating unacceptable commitments for the Church Commissioners, is there any way in which their assets could help to ease the situation, particularly over the period in which past service deficit has to be cleared?

The report, which has been circulated to a wide range of church bodies, foresees a six-month consultation process within dioceses starting some time after Easter and a report to General Synod on options in February 2007. The consultation comes in advance of the statutory three-yearly valuation of the clergy pensions scheme as at December 2006.

* Parochial clergy are currently paid an annual stipend of around £19,000 and have the use of a house provided by the Church. The current pension, payable at 65 to those with 37 years’ full-time service, is £11,686, plus a lump sum of three times the pension on retirement. Retired clergy provide their own accommodation, while the Pensions Board provides some assistance for those with limited resources.

4
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
4 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
mike newmanDaveDavid Walker Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Dave
Guest
Dave

The current full CofE pension is already hardly over-generous:- According to the CofE pension folk, if you include a full UK state pension, a (married) priest gets about 19000 pounds per year, and an Archbishop about 30000. So I don’t see how this could be reduced without causing hardship – which is against the principle of the stipend. Similarly the idea of defined cost pensions (putting the risk on the priest) would be against the “stipend” principle. So the only honourable way to avoid further huge cost increases to the churches would be later retirement. Assuming good health in old… Read more »

David Walker
Guest
David Walker

Dave suggests later retirement as a response to the pensions shortfall for the C of E. There are two difficulties with that route; one financial the other pastoral. Most institutions would save by going for later retirement because it would not affect the total number of employees. However the church has a longstanding practice of sustaining as many stipendiary ministers as offer. Later retirement would add to costs because it would mean clergy who would otherwise have been in receipt of a pension at about £13K being in receipt of a stipend, housing and pension contribution package over £30K. My… Read more »

Dave
Guest
Dave

Dear David, I certainly agree that raising the pension age means that more people may have to retire early on health grounds (physical/mental/emotional) – hence I said “assuming good health”. However I disagree that it is unfair that a priest gets the same pension having worked for more years. Of course it is unfair if you focus only on the interests of the priest, but there are other considerations in the church. Regarding the outcome of having more working clergy (and related employment costs) I understand that half the clergy of the CofE are heading for retirement on the next… Read more »

mike newman
Guest
mike newman

A further thought… An increase in retirement age will, I suggest, be unhelpful from both the perspective of mission and church life. Already the average age profile of clergy is too high to effectively reach the younger generations, though I know that there are individual exceptions to this. Also, faced with another five years of ministry, any thinking person – hopefully clergy are that – who has been in ministry a decent amount of time, would start to pace themselves more and thus outlay less time and energy on their work. Most would still be working well within their job… Read more »