Thinking Anglicans

the views of Archbishop Sentamu

Last Friday, the Archbishop of York gave a lecture in Newcastle, to the Readers of that diocese. You can read the full text of what he said here.

This event has provoked extensive press coverage. The longest is based on an interview conducted the same day, before the lecture, for the Daily Mail by Sarah Sands. You can read this interview at Archbishop blames ‘chattering classes’ for collapse of Britain’s spiritual life.

You can read a rehash of the same interview in The Times here. Hat tip to Andrew Brown for spotting this.

There was also this in the Sunday Times and this from the Press Association, and this in the Telegraph.

23
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
23 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
Göran Koch-SwahneCheryl CloughChristopher ShellFord Elmsdavew Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
DaveW
Guest
DaveW

I basically agree with him. I thank him and Michael Nazir[-Ali] for their recent comments for speaking with such boldness and clarity

Merseymike
Guest

I think we need to be extremely careful before allowing religion to have too dominant a place in the public sphere. I believe the State should be secular, not run according to the whims of a small minority of people who actively practice any religion.

That doesn’t mean that people should not be enabled to practice their religion as they wish, but I see little reason for that to be officially recognised. Sentamu must realise that he represents one of many pressure groups, and that is how his spin ought to be regarded.

Ford Elms
Guest
Ford Elms

I agree with you there, Merseymike, and I think Jesus does too. “My Kingdom is not of this world.” I believe it’s called Erastianism: too close a linking of Church and State, and England has been guilty of it at least since Henry VIII got desperate for an heir.

Cheryl Clough
Guest

Thanks Simon for the plethora of related links. It’s hard to know where to comment without repeating oneself. Personally, I am not opposed to a pluralistic state, with secularism being one form of philosophy. As posted elsewhere, it is healthy for religion to have to justify itself and argue its merits with the “other”. It means holiness becomes more than being the only one who reads and quotes a holy text, to actually walking the talk. Similarly, secularism can never be robust unless it has religions to debate against. I was thinking about this overnight, and it reminded me of… Read more »

laurence
Guest
laurence

The Archbishop of York’s interview in the Daily Mail sounds mostly like an exercise in nostalgia, to my ears. –Rukers ‘Made in Britain’ ? I remember what they were used to do !

I too get nostalgic–its a besetting thing of middle age–but because Sentamu’s rulers and the wooden rulers of Empire are no more does not mean a collapse in ‘spirituality’–does it ?

I miss all kinds of things (including some of JS’s) and also milking by hand, and Mattins, and Round the Horn–amd all the certainties — but surely we have to leave home some time ? –however agonizing….

laurence
Guest
laurence

We had something close to a ‘theocracy’ in Briatian, in the seventeenth century, and it just doesn’t work.

I think ‘secularisation’ set in with the Restoration, and it freed people up to follow THEIR own belief –not that of King or Protector etc., and included ‘free thinkers’, Jews, and loads of people just being or find themselves.

Once we all gets to reading the Bible for ourselves ‘in the vulgar tongue’–there’s no stopping us–there’s no stopping the process unleashed –it has, as it happends led inenexorably to ‘seculrisation’ and this ain’t all bad, not at all.

DaveW
Guest
DaveW

Dear Ford Elms,
Of course Jesus also taught for the His Kingdom to come and His will to be done on earth as in heaven, so you cant really agree to want a secular government rather than a Kingdom Government unless you dont want what He said; the two are not the same as Jesus says “My Kingdom is not of this world”

Christopher Shell
Guest
Christopher Shell

Dave is right here. Politics is not one ‘world’ nad the kingdom of God another. Nobody seriously believes that there is more than one ‘world’ in that particular sense. And no-one could seriously suggest that it doesn’t matter which party gets in or what their policies are. Christians by definition will want their policies to be as closely aligned to the kingdom as possible.

Merseymike
Guest
Merseymike

We do have a secular government – and that’s certainly something I wish to continue, as do, I believe, the vast majority of people in the UK.

Göran Koch-Swahne
Guest

No, Christopher Shell,

not Christians. Mixing state and church does irreparable damage to both.

DaveW
Guest
DaveW

We have a government which contains Christians, so it isnt all secular. It also contains for example humanists, Muslims and Hindu and all kinds of people, awhich I believe suits the vast majority of people in the UK. Obviously as a Christian I prefer to have Christians in governement

Christopher Shell
Guest
Christopher Shell

hi Goran
So let’s get this straight: you think there is a little box marked ‘religion’ which has no connection with the rest of life.

That is certainly not the case in the real world. So which world is it the case in?

Ford Elms
Guest
Ford Elms

It’s not about the nasty secularists. We have always confused the Kingdom of God with the Kingdoms of Earth, most spectacularly in the Byzantine Empire. We Christians are called to work for the Kingdom, but we also know it won’t happen till the return of Christ. Of course our faith should inform our voting and our particiation in society, as well as our commenting on society, but just because we elect a party that goes along with what we think the Kingdom’s values are doesn’t mean we’re doing anything particularly holy, and it certainly doesn’t mean we have some sort… Read more »

Göran Koch-Swahne
Guest

No Christopher Shell,

I said nothing of the sort. I am not a Calvinist, but that does not make me a Pietist.

I’m Church of Sweden and the ecclesiology of the Church of Sweden since the 1460ies is “in the World but not of it”.

DaveW
Guest
DaveW

Dear Ford Elms, Your wrote “We have always confused the Kingdom of God with the Kingdoms of Earth,” Some may well have but the point was we know God’s Kingdom isnt of this world, so kingdoms of this world can only mirror His Kingdom to any degree. I also disagree with you in that the Kingdom of God is near Jesus said, and not far. When we do His will and acknowledge His rule and reign I believe the Kingdom is manifested here on earth as in heaven. but you wrote “Our job is to live the Kingdom’s values in… Read more »

Cheryl Clough
Guest

Jesus separated church and state. See Matthew 22:12-22, which includes:

“But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, “You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me?… “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.””

Leslie Fletcher
Guest
Leslie Fletcher

I have just returned from the lecture given by the Archbishop of Canterbury at the launch of the Manchester Research Institute for Religion and Civil Society which has been mentioned in another thread here and is relevant to this one. I found the Archbishop’s lecture, which developed themes in his recent Times article, disappointing and conservative. Rather than seeking a real debate with secularism, he identified a narrow (=bad) public secularism and a broad (=good) version. Characteristically, he used the long words – “programmatic” and “procedural” – to identify them! From the “good” version, he developed a theory of civil… Read more »

Ford Elms
Guest
Ford Elms

“the Kingdom of God is near Jesus said, and not far”

Indeed, DaveW, it’s all around us, and if we weren’t so frail we could see it. I didn’t say the Kingdom was far away, just not something that our political manouverings can establish.

davew
Guest
davew

Dear Ford Elms,
Well I would say that the Kingdom of God is where God’s rule and reign is manifested which is in heaven but can occur on earth.

Ford Elms
Guest
Ford Elms

“the Kingdom of God is where God’s rule and reign is manifested which is in heaven but can occur on earth.”

And will be on Earth, at the parousia. I believe Revelation is a very complex allegory, but the City comes down from heaven to the New Earth, that, allegory though it may be, means to me the Kingdom is as much about creation made new as it is about going to some place else.

Christopher Shell
Guest
Christopher Shell

Goran-
Great, so if we are in the world and not of it, then you are definitely in it. That means that you are included in what we call the state, and nonChristians have no more right than Christians to decide how the state runs.

Cheryl Clough
Guest

Yep CS. I agree with “…nonChristians have no more right than Christians to decide how the state runs”. That’s called democracy. One soul. One vote. Affirmation for the principles of the suffrage movement. A rejection of gerrymanders, of apartheid. Contempt for electoral fraud, rigging and bribing. A preference for preferential voting as it forms a more diverse parliament that more truly reflects the diversity of opinions in the community. Plus, (shock, horror) souls have to learn to co-operate and communicate to get bills passed. Which means bugs get ironed out, difficult issues get the extended debate they deserve, contentious or… Read more »

Göran Koch-Swahne
Guest

No less, Christopher.

But you seem to forget that the advocates of any kind of Theonomy are in the minority ;=)