Thinking Anglicans

New Orleans: Sunday reports

Updated Sunday evening

The Sunday Telegraph has extensive reporting by Jonathan Wynne-Jones:
Archbishop prays for miracle in gay rights row
Homosexuality not a ‘disease’, says Archbishop
Church leaders on the brink of schism

Reuters Anglican gay deadline looms in New Orleans

Episcopal News Service ‘Day of Service’ puts bishops to work in Mississippi, New Orleans

Living Church Multiple Resolutions Await Bishops on Monday and Bishop Steenson Will Become a Roman Catholic

The BBC radio programme Sunday has a report from New Orleans by Stephen Bates which is available here, go forward about 20 minutes. Better URL tomorrow. As The Lead mentions:

The interview broadened into attendance at Lambeth Conference. In Bates’ telling the majority of Nigerian bishops want to go to Lambeth — contrary to the position of their primate, Peter Akinola.

Sunday evening updates

Episcopal News Service Trumpet the gospel, Presiding Bishop tells New Orleans cathedral congregation and Presiding Bishop’s sermon at Christ Church Cathedral, New Orleans

There are further proposals from bishops as to what to do, including this: A Proposal to the House of Bishops from Bishop John Howe.

33
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
33 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
23 Comment authors
NPFord ElmsGöran Koch-SwahneCheryl Va. Cloughprecision Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
James
Guest
James

Although being gay does mean wanting to have sex with men, it also means loving other men. I want the man I love to be happy. I want to do nice things for him. I want to have children with him. I want to nurse him through sickness. And even the sex part–I want him to have pleasure. I am supposed to experience these feelings as a “disorder,” according to many of the bishops who spoke. I am supposed to think these feelings are wrong and need to be changed, and can be changed, and if I don’t experience the… Read more »

The Reverend L Roberts
Guest
The Reverend L Roberts

Thank you, Rowan ! At last !

The anti-gay forces will be no more grateful to you for your care of them, after today, than if you had continued to speak up for us gay & lesbian believers, on your translation to Canterbury.

So many of the strident and most vocal anti-gay church-men seem incapable of quiet reflection, empathy for Other people, or a ‘Live & let live’ approach to sharing a church or a planet together.

Colin Coward
Guest

Jonathan Wynne-Jones is reporting from New Orleans for The Telegraph. Jonathan was formerly on the staff of the Church of England Newspaper, conservative evangelical in stance, and the Telegraph is conservative politically. Jonathan reports: “Dr Williams’s support for gays will fuel anger among conservative Church members who will see his message of support as direct challenge to their deeply held view that homosexuality is a sin.” “… his message of support for homosexual rights will be seen by religious conservatives as confirmation that he has taken sides against them and that they are viewed as the rebels in the Anglican… Read more »

badman
Guest
badman

If Dr Williams gives up on the conservatives it will at least in part be because they showed impatience and bad faith in the rush to send more and more border crossing bishops into the USA, even before the 30 September “deadline”. Not only was this a breach of catholicity in itself, it also suggested that no realistic outcome would bring them back into line. The Archbishop of Canterbury is on record as saying that he will pursue unity over truth. But once the conservatives showed that they had no commitment to unity, they made it more likely that the… Read more »

Merseymike
Guest
Merseymike

James – very well said. I think, though, for me and many other gay men, what the church says doesn’t really matter any more. British society has moved on in leaps and bounds without the church – if they want to try playing catch-up then I will welcome it, but really, its no longer a priority for me. I think it was the realisation that life without church – which is what I have essentially had for a couple of years now – can be every bit as fulfilling. But if things really do move on, then there’s no reason… Read more »

L Roberts
Guest
L Roberts

‘Mercy’ & ‘compassion’ have taken on a new meaning in this usage. What lexicon is this ! And ‘a plea’ of the empowered further to exclude and misrepresent the marginalised. :—- ‘On July 2, the Rt. Rev. Charles E. Jenkins, Bishop of Louisiana, sent a letter to Bishop Jefferts Schori and enclosing a resolution which he described as “a plea for compassion, mercy, and a united way forward.” The resolution, which also contains the endorsement of 11 other bishops, calls on members of the House of Bishops to end permission for same-sex blessings, deny consent to the consecration of partnered… Read more »

L Roberts
Guest
L Roberts

Jeffrey N Steenson has become disillusioned about the catholicity of TEC –suddenly noticing it acts as an autonomous Church. He has chosen the classic (Anglican) course to re-illusionment. Going over to Rome often only works (if at all) in the short-term –as all the returnees show. He is likely to find much behind the scenes, and below the surface of the RC denomination, which is far from his imagined ideal of catholicity. There is something real & honest about the struggles and ambiguities of TEC. I welcome his tone of respect for TEC and its Presiding Bishop. an honourable approach… Read more »

Viriato da Silva
Guest
Viriato da Silva

“The Archbishop of Canterbury is on record as saying that he will pursue unity over truth. But once the conservatives showed that they had no commitment to unity, they made it more likely that the Archbishop would articulate as before his own understanding of the truth.”

Precisely.

The conservatives have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

Charlotte
Guest
Charlotte

I think badman’s got it.

Bob in SW PA
Guest
Bob in SW PA

It’s a little late but still sounds good, Thanks +++Rowan. I have often thought one day the ABC would finally say enough is enough and finally he has. I have to wonder if Akinola, at his meeting with the ABC, didn’t start with the gay bashing and the ABC said, this is not the kind of talk Jesus would condone.

Peace, Bob

Leonardo Ricardo
Guest
Leonardo Ricardo

So…schism already…last one out is a monkeys uncle!

Lisa Fox
Guest

Badman, the Archbishop made it pretty clear Friday that he has no sympathy for the U.S. parishes trying to play the game of “We’re-Anglican-but-not-Episcopalian.” I transcribed one of his comments here:
http://my-manner-of-life.blogspot.com/2007/09/gods-grace-given-sacramentally.html
Strangely, few of the conservative bloggers seem to have picked up on his statement.

(Simon, I hope I’m not violating a rule by linking to my own blog. If so, please delete this comment.)

NP
Guest
NP

Colin et al……. so, we have not had TEC(USA)’s statement nor, therefore, any response to it from the ABC / Primates – and you are claiming some sort of victory??? You thought the ABC was going to go there and ask them to repent? Rowan Williams to do something like that? Of course not….that would be far too straight forward for him but, look at his record, ask J John – the ABC will be doing his political job, working for a fudge, trying to keep as many as possible in the “party”. Colin Coward – would you not like… Read more »

Colin Coward
Guest

NP, are you revealing something of your own self in your recent post, and missing the point entirely? I have not used the language of victory or of having something to crow about – this is your language, and reveals how you and many conservatives think about the Communion and those with whom you disagree. You either think you are going to achieve a victory or be subjected to a defeat. That is what ++Rowan and many, many others are carefully avoiding, and in the process, apparently make themselves appear weak or indecisive. It’s a hard road to travel, the… Read more »

NP
Guest
NP

Yes, Colin…we are travelling on a hard road – my point to you was that we have not arrived and it is too early for you to be saying what the ABC has done – he has done very little so far. I notice you ignore my questions to you – would you not like to see a clear statement from TEC to say its bishops stand by VGR and what they did in 2003? I would because at least it would show some consistency, honesty and integrity……rather than searching for forms of words which allow people to say one… Read more »

Martin Reynolds
Guest

“you would have something to crow about,”
I think that about sums up the mindset of this contributor.
So sad, so desperately sad.
Christ have mercy!

No – quite plainly Rowan does not think we are ill or like the bishop of Chester we need to be (or can be) cured.

I am not normally a fan of J W-J’s reportage – but I think he has hit gold here. As I listened to Rowan’s response to the question I smiled to realise just how deeply that cuts into the agenda of those who would exclude us.

It will have significant repercussions.

ettu
Guest
ettu

The arresting statement to me was “The interview broadened into attendance at Lambeth Conference. In Bates’ telling the majority of Nigerian bishops want to go to Lambeth — contrary to the position of their primate, Peter Akinola.” Quite a statement regarding potential attendance and, far more significantly, an insight into the compex face of GS attitudes.

Pluralist
Guest

I think Colin has this right, and Lisa a close observer. In all of this, Rowan Williams has been criticised for being ineffective, and he frustrates people (including me). However, I do admire this pathway of doggedly plodding on in the messy situation without aggression and without unnecessary assertiveness for the sake of it. It is something to learn from. I do disagree with his Covenant strategy, in fact I sometimes wonder if he would not disagree with his Covenant strategy (if only in how it has raised expectations of definitions amongst some of those supporting it – I scratch… Read more »

Charles William Allen
Guest
Charles William Allen

As a gay priest I do of course welcome ++Rowan’s remarks. But I wonder if people are not reading too much into them. He said, “I do not assume that homosexual inclination is a disease.” Grammatically speaking, that is NOT the same as saying, “Homosexuality is not a disease.” He said that he does not assume this at the outset. He did not say that one could not draw that conclusion. I don’t think ++Rowan is likely to draw that conclusion himself, but it still seems that he did not rule out that possibility for other reasonable people. Unless there… Read more »

Anglicanus
Guest
Anglicanus

The contrast in language and style between the posts of Colin Coward and NP, responding to Dr Williams’ remarks at the press conference, is a thing to be noted. One labours, at great personal cost, for the continuing sacramental union that membership of the Church of England offers within the Anglican Communion. The other seems determined to achieve purity at a cost which is met by others and not her/himself. I hope that the result of Dr. Williams meetings with the TEC(USA) House of Bishops and with the Archbishop of Nigeria will be a more transparent willingness on HIS part… Read more »

NP
Guest
NP

Anglicanus says “One labours, at great personal cost, for the continuing sacramental union that membership of the Church of England offers within the Anglican Communion.” Does this include – plain rejection of certain Anglican Communion resolutions and the interpretation of scripture behind them? – not just rejection of the words but encouragement of people who are vicars in their rejection of the requirements of their own church with regard to their manner of life? – demanding membership of the Anglican Communion but not being willing to accept restraint on behaviour demanded of its vicars by the Anglican Communion? This is… Read more »

Christopher Shell
Guest
Christopher Shell

Hi James-

There is no evidence that Jesus or any other Jew of his time even considered the possibility of extramarital sexual relations being either lawful or justifiable (as opposed to forgiveable, which they certainly were and are).

By reading between the lines you are exemplifying a very important principle. Namely: as between those who want to make Jesus a citixen of their own country in their own era and those who endeavour to understand him in his own setting it is obvious which of the two is more to be listened to.

Malcolm+
Guest
Malcolm+

Enough, NP. Iy is intellectually dishonest to rant on and on and on about how some people have supposedly rejected ONE Lambeth resolution when you and your allies have deliberately, provocatively and venomously trampled all over repeated resolutions from Lambeth after Lambeth after Lambeth.

Bear in mind the sin for which our Lord seemed to have the greatest contempt. Hint – a nine letter word beginning with “h” and ending with “ypocrisy.”

Colin Coward
Guest

NP, of course I reject Lambeth 1.10 and support every Archbishop, Bishop, priest and lay person who does the same. Lambeth 1.10 does not have status as official teaching of the church. If you tell me it does, you are not Anglican. Neither the Lambeth Conference nor the Primates meeting have authority to impose anything on individual provinces. They have a moral authority, but that authority is weakened when it is used to try and impose something so obviously (to me) abusive and unChristian. Archbishop Rowan is struggling for a unity which includes you and me. I have been a… Read more »

bls
Guest

“I am asking the church to be honest about her LGBT members now and to change the teaching of the church when the teaching is abusive towards LGBT people.” ——————– And that is the key point. The Church is irrationally abusive towards LGBT people. It’s long past time for it to stop – and at this point I don’t think people will rest until it does stop. The problem lies in the way the Church escapes facing its own abusive and destructive behavior: it objectifies LGBT people. It doesn’t think of us as human beings at all, because it can’t… Read more »

precision
Guest
precision

Celibate means unmarried, chaste means abstaining from sexual activity, I wish people would maintain the distinction and not talk ambiguous nonsense.

Cheryl Va. Clough
Guest

Lisa It is great that you have your own website to expand on ideas. That idea was canvassed and approved here when the word count was brought in (a bunch of nasty conservatives tried to overwhelm the site and the limit was instated at that time). Simon has on a number of times affirmed it is okay to link to your own site or longer articles elsewhere. Welcome, I’ve enjoyed your contributions. Be warned, if you are seen as a competent technically savvy of liberal Christian tendencies, expect nasty postings. They do it to everyone. SOS if they are too… Read more »

Cheryl Va. Clough
Guest

Precision wrote “Celibate means unmarried, chaste means abstaining from sexual activity”

I always took celibate meaning to refrain from sex with another being and chaste to mean modest (i.e. not easy to get or avoids indiscrete sexual activies).

Supporting links
http://www.english-test.net/gre/vocabulary/words/209/gre-definitions.php#celibate
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/celibacy
http://dict.die.net/celibacy/
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/chaste
http://dict.die.net/chaste/

The thing that intrigues me is that Precision has emphasised one element of celibacy and I have been more aware of another.

How does Precision classify someone who does not engage with sex with another living entity, but relies on masturbation to satisfy their sexual needs?

Ford Elms
Guest
Ford Elms

+Rowan alludes to homosexuality not being a disease. This is of course anathema to the conservatives, many of whom say precisely that, and who quote propaganda masquerading as science to back that up. This goes along with some African bishops claiming there was no homosexuality in Africa before the coming of the white man, a statement similar to Ahmedinajad’s “we don’t have homosexuals in Iran” statement yesterday at Columbia University. Of course they do, those they haven’t executed. CBC did a short piece on gay people in Iran, it can be seen on Youtube. Conservatives who don’t understand might want… Read more »

Göran Koch-Swahne
Guest

Precision wrote: “Celibate means unmarried, chaste means abstaining from sexual activity, I wish people would maintain the distinction and not talk ambiguous nonsense.” Chaste means chaste, not abstaining. It is about not indulging or abusing anything or any body. “Moderation, Grace divine” as the Ancients put it. It has nothing to do with being married or not. Abstention is a different thing. It starts with Water (for drinking and otherwise), then soap, then bread, then commodité (sorry no English word for that), last comes sex (a Modern to late Modern concept, un-known where and when I was a child). All… Read more »

NP
Guest
NP

Colin – well, someone should have taught you before you were ordained that the scriptures, as understood by the CofE for centuries and still today, do require certain standards of its vicars……. these requirements are set out quite clearly by the CofE, are they not?

“Don’t ask, don’t tell policies” may have allowed some people to ignore certain CofE requirements – but I really do not see any honour in that.

Ford Elms
Guest
Ford Elms

“”Don’t ask, don’t tell policies” may have allowed some people to ignore certain CofE requirements – but I really do not see any honour in that.” Indeed! All my friends tell me that all the time when they talk about the hypocrisy of the Christian Right. “Don’t ask, don’t tell” has allowed many self hating gay people to put on the breastplate of righteousness and be as homophobic as possible to hide the truth and the Church has graciously helped them do it in this fashion. Then people like you admire their holiness and principle in standing for the Gospel!… Read more »

NP
Guest
NP

Ford – any honour in avoiding the primary issue by raising fifteen others?

Two wrongs do not make a right

1 Cor 5:12 We do have to make judgments in the church, even though we are all sinners, to make sure it is in line with God’s will and not ours.