T A

Telegraph supports bishops

In a surprising move, the Daily Telegraph has published a leader comment in favour of Church of England bishops. Commenting on a news article by its own Religious Affairs Correspondent, Jonathan Petre, headlined One in five C of E bishops faces sack, the leader says:

Don’t knock the Church of England’s bishops

When, in 1942, Winston Churchill nominated William Temple for Canterbury, he remarked that he had chosen the only half-crown article in a sixpenny bazaar.

That was too harsh on the bishops of the time, but how does the bishops’ bazaar compare today?

In monetary terms, their services are less valued now. A diocesan bishop receives £36,230 a year, and an auxiliary suffragan bishop only £29,560.

That is less than a teacher, though we expect great things of bishops.

But, as we report today, instead of finding ways of attracting better candidates, perhaps by increasing the amount they receive to a level where they might no longer wonder how to pay for the children’s shoes, the Church Commissioners, in a secret document, have recommended that more than a fifth of bishops should simply be abolished.

Some dioceses might also go, or be merged. There is talk of selling off historic palaces.

No one is underestimating the difficulties facing the Church of England. Its full-time clergy have diminished in the past century from 24,000 to 9,000. Parishes are amalgamated, and churches crumble and are closed.

The apparent decline reflects lay secularisation, but also a reduced status for clergy. This leads to a diminished pool of talent from which bishops may be drawn.

The solution is not to bash the bishops once more. Real savings should come from trimming a proliferating bureaucracy, not from cutting bishops’ incomes.

As for selling off historic palaces, that is an abdication of trust and a pointless transfer of historic property to unreliable custodians.

A success story for the Church of England has been its cathedrals: well attended and able to draw in those previously little interested in Christianity.

One model for the C of E’s future is the building of central teams in dioceses, flexible and mobile enough to meet local needs. This is no time to weaken episcopal vigour.

2
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
L RobertsPrior Aelred Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Prior Aelred
Guest

Actually, reducing the number of bishops to enable an increase in pay as well as to reflect the declining size of their flocks doesn’t seem at all unreasonable to me — archdeacons can help out a lot on the administrative side, can’t they?

L Roberts
Guest
L Roberts

Get real these are huge sums of money — on this stipend their children will not go unshod.

Cut the bishops’ stipends and raise standards !