Thinking Anglicans

WATCH says "Time to Move On!"

WATCH (Women and the Church) has today issued this Synod Briefing Statement.

TIME TO MOVE ON!

Where we are now – Anglican women in ordained ministry

The Church of England depends on its women priests. Twenty years ago (11.11.92) General Synod voted to ordain women as priests. Today we have over three thousand women ministering in parishes and others in chaplaincies in hospitals, prisons, schools and universities. One in three priests is female and almost 50% of new ordinands. Four of our cathedrals have female Deans and there are 26 female archdeacons active in the leadership teams of dioceses.

There have been women bishops in the Anglican Communion since Barbara Harris was ordained in 1989. Since then 34 women have been consecrated in New Zealand, Canada, Australia, Cuba, South Africa and the USA. In all these provinces of the Anglican Communion, no legal provision was made for those who oppose women in ordained ministry. Other provinces as varied as Scotland and the Sudan have opened the way for women bishops but not yet made a first appointment.

The discussion so far…

GS voted on a motion to ordain women as deacon, priest and bishop in 1978 – it lost. We have been discussing this issue ever since – for a whole generation.

The present legislative process began in 2000. Since then there have been 3 major church reports, regular debates in Synod and fifteen months of detailed drafting work. All the dioceses in the country have been consulted and at every step of the way support for this legislation to enable women to be bishops has been overwhelming: 42 of 44 dioceses voted ‘yes’ – with more than 75% of all votes cast in favour.

The provision for those opposed in the draft legislation

One reason for the overwhelming support for this legislation is the generous support offered to those who are opposed.

Under the draft Measure any parish can request a male priest or bishop on the grounds of their theological conviction and these convictions must be respected. This will be backed up by a Statutory Code of Practice with legal force. Some people say that this is not enough, but it is as much as can be given without seriously damaging the Church – and 29 dioceses voted against further provision being made.

This is a compromise for everyone

The draft ‘Measure’ is a considerable compromise for those in favour of women bishops. There will be parishes where women will be barred from serving as priests, and women bishops will have to delegate to a male bishop where the parish requests it. Nowhere else in the Anglican Communion has provision been spelled out in law at all – things have been worked out through building relationships ‘on the ground’. Most of WATCH’s supporters would much prefer to have seen this sort of arrangement in the Church of England too. But we have compromised so as to make space for those who are finding this change difficult.

Voting ‘yes’ for this would also be a compromise for those opposed because the legislation does not give them as much reassurance as they would like.

The 20th November

On Tuesday 20th November, General Synod will have to consider “The Measure” as it stands. Nothing can be done to amend it now without starting all over again.

Some, from both sides, want to wait in the hope of getting something better, but to do so would be incredibly destructive. Another 10 years going over and over the same arguments would cripple the Church’s credibility and mission. It would also deprive the Church of the skills and wisdom of women bishops. To waste our time and talents in this way would be quite wrong.

Despite our concerns that this Measure does not do enough to eradicate discrimination from the Church, WATCH is praying that Synod will vote ‘yes’ on 20th November. This is far from the perfect Measure for women, but it is what has been negotiated after years of consultation amongst those of all perspectives. A ‘yes’ will enable women bishops to be appointed whilst allowing that those who disagree to have a respected place within the Church of England.

Time to Decide!

‘To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven’ Ecclesiastes 3:1

There is a time for discussion and a time for decision. Twenty years after the vote for women’s ordination to the priesthood, and twelve years after we started exploring this issue in detail, it’s time to decide – time to move on.

The Reverend Rachel Weir Chair of WATCH said “This week we have been celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the vote for women priests. We pray that next week, Synod will complete the work that was started in November 1992 and vote for women bishops.

18
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
18 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
JeremyRosie BatesPrimroseleagueErika BakerLaurence Roberts Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Jeremy
Guest
Jeremy

“There will be parishes where women will be barred from serving as priests, and women bishops will have to delegate to a male bishop where the parish requests it.”

Exactly. These are the outrageous results of this cobbled-together compromise.

If you want to cleanse the Church of England of the sin of misogyny, giving it “respect” is a very bad start.

Jean Mayland
Guest
Jean Mayland

Bravo to the WATCH statement I hope and pray that with all its faults the Measure passes.

Gary Paul Gilbert
Guest
Gary Paul Gilbert

Given that New Zealand, Canada, Australia, Cuba, South Africa and the USA do not make legal exceptions for those opposed to the ordination of women as priests and bishops, it is a bad precedent for the Church of England to enshrine discrimination into its canons.

Those opposed to equality would probably be happier in other religious bodies.

Gary Paul Gilbert

Laurence Roberts
Guest
Laurence Roberts

According to Lindsay Urwin we have not waited long enough !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7783rBrEqc4&feature=youtu.be

Rosie Bates
Guest
Rosie Bates

Whilst part of angry me wants to say ‘No,No,No’ to the present proposals – what a crying waste this could be? I believe love casts out fear and anger and have faith in what certain women waiting in the wings can do in the eye of the storm facing the C of E on many levels. The very women we might wish to delay for a more favourable climate are those who have the grace and guts to openly address the major problems in the disaster zone. They will I believe get on with the rescue operation in communion with… Read more »

John
Guest
John

Yes, Laurence. This man/person/bishop may be restricted in his thinking, but he’s still struggling, by his lights (however unreconstructed we adjudge them) to stay in the C of E, which is where – oh, so obviously! – almost all of his like want to remain. So we should accommodate them to the best of our being. They’re not blackmailing us: they’re trying to hang on in there. Have compassion for them.

Laurence Roberts
Guest
Laurence Roberts

John thanks – but I don’t even know who you are !

Jeremy
Guest
Jeremy

“So we should accommodate them to the best of our being.”

Not if the accommodation makes the C of E a laughingstock to the rest of the country.

Let’s not indulge in squeaky-wheel thinking.

There’s the vocal minority within the church. And the silent majority, ten times larger, outside the church.

Which should an established church worry more about?

Rosie Bates
Guest
Rosie Bates

Yes we should accommodate them. How else are we permitted to journey with each other in a transforming, transparant, Spirit filled manner? We presume too much about the will of God if we do not make reasonable holy space for each other.

Jeremy
Guest
Jeremy

I’ll respond on the practical level and the theological level. On a practical level: We live in a fallen world. If we’ve learned anything from the past two decades of international Anglican politics, it is that bullies run roughshod when allowed to do so. Therefore, do not allow it. Going along to get along has its limits. In this world of ours, it can be self-defeating. The reign of God is not here yet. We wish it were otherwise–that turn the other cheek could rule the day–but we know that it does not. The lion does not yet lie down… Read more »

primroseleague
Guest
primroseleague

Jeremy, I really don’t know why I’m rising to it, for it’s truly all over for us bar the shouting, but will you please get it into your head that it’s not misogyny. OK, we might have been badly led, and the case might have been made terribly by our “leaders” for the last 20 years. But it’s not misogyny or equality. Men and women are absolutely equal – I flew yesterday on a plane with a woman pilot. I’ve fought in war with female comrades on the front line (in the navy, so our front line is a little… Read more »

Erika Baker
Guest
Erika Baker

Primroseleague, I shouldn’t really wade into this, but I would like you to understand that to liberals, it looks precisely like misogyny. And the reason for that is that there is outstanding pro-women theology out there. It’s not a barmy idea but a well thought out theological principle. Therefore, it cannot be dismissed lightly. And many liberals believe that it is not theology that shapes our outlook on life but that it is our outlook on life that determines the theology we can deep down believe in – provided the theology isn’t barmy and can be dismissed lightly. And liberals… Read more »

Jeremy
Guest
Jeremy

“[W]ill you please get it into your head that it’s not misogyny…. I just believe on a reading of scripture that [women] can’t be priests.”

Ah, but why do you read scripture that way?

Or do you really think that when you interpret scripture, you do not bring your biases to the text?

1 Timothy 2:12 says, “But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man.”

Did this give you any difficulty when you served in Her Majesty’s Navy?

Primroseleague
Guest
Primroseleague

Jeremy, None at all -I’m Anglo catholic not con evo so it’s nothing to do with headship and more, as Erika correctly deduces, worry that ordination doesn’t stick for the purposes of the sacraments. The problem, of course, is that exactly the same can be said for you – why do you read it the other way? As with everything in life, two people can use the same information to arrive at two different conclusions. I post rarely on this forum, but i’ve said before that I really want it to be possible, I just go to the altar in… Read more »

Jeremy
Guest
Jeremy

I read it the other way because for 20 years I’ve received communion from women priests with nary a qualm. You might think that in this, there’s a chicken-and-egg problem. I rather think, however, that once the situation on the ground changes, people become much more comfortable with the change. Which may have been your experience at the parish level. Ex ante and ex post are very different vantage points. Theologically, I don’t hold much truck with sacramental-assurance doubt. To me that position smacks of the Donatist heresy, with a misogynist twist. The Catholic position is that what ensures sacramental… Read more »

Rosie Bates
Guest

This is one story of how we begin to Re–Member for we are going to Graceland! Part 1 We constantly struggle with the temporal and the eternal and all our fussing and fighting has to come to terms with the truth of this passage from Isaiah 45.9-11 ‘Woe to you who strive with your Maker, earthen vessels with the potter! Does the clay say to the one who fashions it, “What are you making”? or “Your work has no handles”? Woe to anyone who says to a father, “What are you begetting?” or to a woman, “With what are you… Read more »

Rosie Bates
Guest

This is one story of how we begin to Re-Member for we are going to Graceland! Part Two Isaiah 45.9-11 ‘Woe to you who strive with your Maker, earthen vessels with the potter! Does the clay say to the one who fashions it, “What are you making”? or “Your work has no handles”? Woe to anyone who says to a father, “What are you begetting?” or to a woman, “With what are you in labour?” Thus says the Lord, the Holy One of Israel, and its Maker: Will you question me about my children, or command me concerning the work… Read more »

Jeremy
Guest
Jeremy

From the Telegraph, after the synod’s decision: “There will now almost certainly be calls in Parliament for the Church of England’s exemption from equality legislation — effectively allowing it to discriminate against women by barring them from becoming bishops — to be removed, opening the way for women to bring a legal challenge. “If successful, it could lead to women becoming bishops without any of the arranged safeguards for traditionalists agreed by Synod. “Opponents of the ordination of women bishops said they would now sit down with Bishop Welby to try to find a way forward. But under the Church’s… Read more »