Thinking Anglicans

Sunday programme discusses European court rulings

The BBC Radio 4 programme Sunday today has a major feature on this.

Starting at about 27 minutes in, there is a lengthy discussion, not only of the court’s rulings, but also of the role played in them by advocacy groups such as the Christian Legal Centre.

The BBC’s own description:

In light of the European rulings on 4 religious discrimination cases this week William asks if the courts are the right place to decide what expressions of faith and belief are acceptable in the workplace. Christian Legal Centre’s Andrew Marsh, gives his opinion.

Also in the programme:

A leading Evangelical, Steve Chalke, this week published an article arguing that the Church should bless committed homosexual partnerships without requiring that they should be celibate. He debates with Dr Stephen Holmes of the Evangelical Alliance who defends their current teaching that gay sex is sinful.

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
8 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
GeoffLaurence RobertsCounterlightTomSimon Sarmiento Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Laurence Roberts
Guest
Laurence Roberts

I found the mention of this week a little confusing (though the link works). The programme is called ‘Sunday’. I heard it live and it was very refreshing to hear such balanced and intelligent approach to the issues considered by ECHR, and the guy from The Christian Legal Centre was well interrogated. The weaknesses of the Centre’s approach was laid bare. The discussion between Chalke and the Evangelical Alliance chap was also very good. What a change of tone from opponents of the human rights of lgbt ! We are no longer sinful, criminal or perverted ! They sounded like… Read more »

cseitz
Guest
cseitz

I would agree that (my former St Andrews colleague) Steve Holmes was very gracious. I am glad the host allowed him some time, vis-a-vis the loquacious Chalke. I suspect in time the resistance to ss marriage will be viewed as criminal conduct. (Though it was intriguing to read that the secular French public do not want the word used beyond its customary sense).

Simon Sarmiento
Guest

Laurence I have adjusted the text to make the date of broadcast clear.

Tom
Guest
Tom

I agree with Laurence’s comments about the Christian Legal Centre – a busted flush? Shirley Chaplin came over as obdurate and offended that anyone who dare suggest there might be a health issue with jewellery was immediately attacking her faith. What she didn’t seem to realise is that if she is the salt of the earth and acted in a Christlike way what need would there be for badges and symbols?
As for Andrew Marsh – was that his name? – such an uncompromising solipsistic self-justification is like wormwood in the mouth.

Counterlight
Guest
Counterlight

In this country, same sex marriage is starting to open up a serious generational divide between older and younger Evangelicals. Many younger Evangelicals appear to want to cut ties to right wing politics and to pursue other issues such as economic justice and environmental stewardship. Policing everyone’s sex lives appears to them to be a waste of time and energy, as well as too great a risk of looking hypocritical and ridiculous. Hardly a month goes by in this country without some earnest public moral scold getting caught with his (it’s almost always his) pants down with a boy or… Read more »

Laurence Roberts
Guest
Laurence Roberts

Thanks very much for that, Simon.

Laurence Roberts
Guest
Laurence Roberts

‘I suspect in time the resistance to ss marriage will be viewed as criminal conduct.’

I have no doubt that you regard the incarceration of lgbt in the UK with repentance and great regret. Never mind, the imprisonment and killing in many countries in the present century.

I look forward to hearing you support those voicing concern and abhorrence for the treatment of lgbt poeple around the world.

Geoff
Guest

“Steve Holmes was very gracious”

As gracious as one can be while deprecating other Christian families as sinful (particularly when the alleged “sin” is simply adherence to the same standard of monogamy and fidelity we hold up as positive for heterosexuals).