THINKING ANGLICANS

animals and sport

Whilst on holiday in Spain I had the opportunity to see what local papers were saying about the recent ban in Barcelona on bullfighting. The very idea that Spain might be banning what the world had thought of as its national sport seemed almost impossible — that is, until you remember what they paid for David Beckham. Maybe bullfighting isn’t the draw it was, either for tourists or locals.

The press began by noting that cock fighting, bear baiting, bull baiting and dog fighting were, like bullfighting, once far more widespread, but across Europe a growing horror of such cruelty to animals had gradually reached everywhere.

The bull doesn’t naturally fight. It’s a gentle herbivore, and, as a domesticated animal, has been bred over hundreds of generations for its gentleness. All idea of fighting is foreign to it. The cows allow us to milk them, and cattle have been our best friends for thousands of years. It doesn’t ‘fight’ at all until lances have been hurled into its back. There is no contest in taking a sword to such a creature. It’s like taking a machine gun to a boy who throws stones.

In Spain, bullfighting had become identified with extreme right wing, oppressive government. It had come to symbolise the oppression of ordinary people, of minorities, of those who were different. So, it was unsurprising that the Catalans, whose language and whose culture had been suppressed in Franco’s time should see themselves as such an minority, and side with the noble, suffering bull, rather than with the murderous weapons of the bullfighter in his suit of lights.

Oppressive regimes glory in portraying punishment and killing as a sign of their power. This is what was at the heart of the circuses of ancient Rome. Ritualised execution in such a state could be the fate of anyone who was different, as Christian martyrs of the first, third or 20th century have testified.

Sports which involve killing brutalise those who take part, and all those who watch.

Now, the Catalans appear to have had enough. In a secret ballot which probably surprised everyone, they outlawed the old national sport. I expect they will be followed by similar votes from people in the other marginalized areas of Spain, and eventually the whole nation will turn against the blood lust of this barbaric sport.

And when they do, we shall need to ask ourselves whether, in order to demonstrate that ours, too, is a civilised society, and part of a modern Europe with decent values, we should ban the sport of hunting wild creatures with dogs.

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
8 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
Michael A. OgorzalyJohn D LewisJohn WebsterdeejeeTom Ambrose Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Christopher Culver
Guest
Christopher Culver

I don’t see what this has to do with the Church of England. Sure, notions of animal rights might have a slight bearing on Christianity, but there are many Christians who interpret Genesis to read that animals exist solely for our pleasure and cooking. This seems off-topic and inappropriate.

mumcat
Guest

I think it has everything to do with not only the CofE but all Christian churches. God created the animals, just as God created human beings. God gave human beings charge of the earth and its resources, which include the animals. I think it is totally arrogant to dismiss cruelty to some of God’s creatures as inappropriate to a Christian venue. It’s because of human arrogance and greed that many animals, birds, fish, and insects are now extinct and, while bulls are not nearing extinction, the enjoyment people take in horrendous treatment of them in the bullring is a true… Read more »

postulate
Guest
postulate

I think the writer should have researched his “domesticated animals” a bit further. I don’t think he knows many cattle farmers or is personally acquainted with bulls. They are very dangerous animals. It seems that every year we read in our Minnesota newspapers about a goring or a death caused by one of these “gentle herbivores.” Granted, that does not mean that they “deserve” to die as an entertainment spectacle. Violent, dangerous boys that throw stones shouldn’t be shot, either. Further, a friend who grew up in Spain asserts that bullfighting is not performed for entertainment but for asserting the… Read more »

Tom Ambrose
Guest
Tom Ambrose

Marcia thinks I should research domesticated animals.
From the age of five I milked cows by hand, and then learned to milk them with a machine. The pedigree herd I worked with always had a bull, as did most farmers in our village.
Funny, I’ve never heard of anyone killed by a bull in England. What does that say about people in Minnesota?
And yes, bullfighting is machismo and asserting dominance – like the way some servicemen have treated Iraqis.

deejee
Guest
deejee

I was annoyed enough by Tom’s argument about fox hunting before he decided on the cheap shot concerning human rights abuses in Iraq. Was that really neccessary just because the person concerned enough to comment on your article was an American? I do not see how you can possibly equate fox hunting with bull fighting. Bull fighting is nothing more than entertainment. Fox hunting is primarily a means of keeping the fox (a pest and nothing more than vermin in the countryside) under control. There is plenty of evidence to suggest it is by far the most effective method, that… Read more »

John Webster
Guest
John Webster

I’m interested in Deejee’s reference to foxes as vermin. (I have no strong opinion about fox-hunting either way, so this doesn’t influence my response.) I guess that we can call all predators vermin. When lions start taking too many cattle in Africa, they are also treated as vermin. And maybe the notion of predators need not be limited to carnivores, but extended generally to any animal that predates on resources allocated to people, e.g. buck eating crops, or seals eating fish. I appreciate that we wouldn’t want ‘vermin’ to over-run our neighbourhoods in the same way that we have over-run… Read more »

John D Lewis
Guest
John D Lewis

Just a few comments: Nearly 50 yrs ago when working in Catalonia as a student there were few who went to bull fights. Most were interested in soccer. Not much changes. The argument against animal cruelty that it makes humans cruel to other humans was put by Hogarth in the 18th century. And its as true now as then. As for fox hunting! What was Oscar Wilde’s line? The Unspeakable in pursuit of the uneatable. As for their presence in suburbia the greatest nuisance to me has been the cub in Bromley, London, who deliberately kept jumping onto a garden… Read more »

Michael A. Ogorzaly
Guest
Michael A. Ogorzaly

“Postulate” says that a Spanish friend told him the bullfight is not for entertainment but to assert the Spanish male’s dominance over nature. Bullfight promoters wouldn’t charge $29.00 a head to have you watch a Spanish man chop down a tree (man over nature, right?). They are trading on the blood and gore that is exhibited in the corrida. Furthermore, since the 18th century, when bullfighting went from being a sport of the nobility to a commercial enterprise meant to bilk the common man out of his hard-earned cash, there have been a NUMBER OF WOMEN who have tortured and… Read more »