Thinking Anglicans

Church in Wales – Same Sex Marriages

updated Thursday and Saturday

The Church in Wales has published some of the papers for next month’s meeting of its Governing Body, including three under the heading Same Sex Marriages.

The main paper is a report by the Standing Doctrinal Commission entitled The Church in Wales & Same Sex Partnerships. There is also an Executive Summary of the report. The executive summary is reproduced below the fold.

Finally there is a Procedural Note explaining how the Governing Body will have an initial discussion of the report at its meeting in April.

update 1

The procedural note referred to a number of background papers from the Standing Doctrinal Commission. These are now available.

Marriage as a Sacrament
Sexuality and the Image of God
The concept of Flourishing in Relation to Marriage as a Good, and the Question of Gay Partnerships
Same Sex Marriage – Biblical Considerations
Fundamental Scriptural Approaches

update 2

David Pocklington of Law & Religion UK has published this useful article: Same-sex partnerships and the Church in Wales.

Executive Summary

Report from the Church in Wales Standing Doctrinal Commission

The Church in Wales and Same-Sex Partnerships.

The report sets out initially the history of marriage as the background to the discussion of same-sex partnerships. In particular this section looks at marriage in Roman times; the Jewish understanding of marriage at the time of Jesus; the early church’s teaching, with its emphasis on celibacy, and the fact that not until the fourth century A.D. did a priest or bishop bless the couple getting married. Not until the thirteenth century, as well, was marriage seen as a sacrament. The report discusses the teaching of the Anglican Book of Common Prayer on marriage, and the crucial importance of the 1754 Marriage Act in England and Wales. Here, for the first time, marriage was only legally valid if performed in an Anglican church by an Anglican cleric. However by 1836 marriage in a registry office was allowed as a concession to non-conformists. The growth of cohabitation and same-sex civil partnerships is discussed, and finally the 2013 Same-Sex Marriage act is mentioned, which becomes law in March 2014, and sets the context for the discussion of the report.

The next section of the report (paragraphs 31-51) discusses the implications for the church of the scientific debate about sexual orientation. In particular, the final three paragraphs of this section argue that science should not determine the mind of the church, but there is a need to reflect on the growing scientific evidence that homosexual orientation should not be regarded as “a pathology but as a natural characteristic which, for a small but significant proportion of the population, is acquired before birth”. What is the moral and theological significance of this fact?

Therefore the report proceeds to discuss the place of scripture and doctrine (paragraphs 52-4). This section is brief, because the lengthy papers on this topic are on the Church in Wales’ website. What is important is that the church engages in a search for holiness for itself before God. The report then considers three options for the Church in Wales. One is a restatement of the traditional position, that marriage is only between a man and a woman (paragraphs 56-77). The second option is the blessing of same-sex partnerships, which is now allowed in some Anglican dioceses in Canada and the United States (paragraphs 78-102). Thirdly there is the option of marriage between a couple irrespective of sexual difference (paragraphs 103-136). Finally the report ends with an emphasis on what a pastoral response would look like.

Peter Sedgwick
Chair

14
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
14 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
Martin ReynoldsGary Paul GilbertFrancisNeville StephensonJudith Maltby Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Kelvin Holdsworth
Guest

So, no mention of a human rights case for marriage to be opened to same-sex couples.

Again.

Martin Retnolds
Guest
Martin Retnolds

Quite
You get a mention though, Kelvin!

Gary Paul Gilbert
Guest
Gary Paul Gilbert

Rather than looking specifically at the importance of marriage equality for same-sex couples and their families, this report attempts to justify a homophobic and misogynistic tradition by appealing to the very tradition in need of reformation. This report makes me think of Matthew 7:9.* Same-sex couples seek equal treatment but are offered a stone. Already members of the mystical body of Christ through baptism, same-sex couples deserve the same respect as sex-discordant couples. Denying them access to marriage is to perpetuate a longstanding injustice against them and to perpetuate gender stereotypes. What would a church look like which knew how… Read more »

Jeremy Pemberton
Guest
Jeremy Pemberton

A much better effort from the Church in Wales than the Church of England. The pastoral section at the end is properly pastoral. It does strike me that those who say they are called to a life of celibacy and non-expression (in any erotic relationship) of their same-sex attraction are asking a lot of a church in expecting it to maintain its “traditional” understanding so that they can continue to feel safe and buttressed in their calling. If their vocation is truly a vocation, then I am sure we would all want to support that. But by its very nature,… Read more »

Scot Peterson
Guest

I’m even more supportive than the others so far (I think). Not sure what Gary’s reading, but while there’s some same-sex attraction stuff at the beginning, they have a good, accurate historical section (including an admission that Linda Woodhead et al. were right and the bishops were wrong–para. 29), and while the first option (against recognizing civil partnership or SSM) is not good (can it be? would I recognise if it were?) the other two are quite good. The civil partnership/blessing option has some pretty progressive stuff in it about the unique character of LGBT relationships, which a lot of… Read more »

James
Guest
James

This beats the CoE’s ham-fisted efforts hands-down. There is actually some theology here, which contrasts starkly with the C of E’s ‘fire-fighting’ after the legally top-heavy influence that was brought to bear on the so-called pastoral statement. Presumably, the C in W will be keen to avoid the terrible fall-out which followed the C of E’s public pronouncements. Of course, the theological complexion of the Welsh house of bishops is very different to the C of E’s. Whereas the English liberal bishops are keeping their heads down (there is no one in that constituency, apart from John Inge, with the… Read more »

Gary Paul Gilbert
Guest
Gary Paul Gilbert

Saying this beats the C of E is not saying much if you’re going to set the bar low. Compared with the Quakers and Unitarians, this is still the Dark Ages. I am tired of these dreary debates, especially when three parodies of positions are presented: the prohibitionist, the separate-but-equal, and the egalitarian. Then it will all be thrown together with no real support for LGBTs. How many decades will it take before the Church in Wales accepts the simple idea of equality? It seems unnecessarily cruel or at least ironic that they quote Rowan Williams’s The Body as Grace,… Read more »

Judith Maltby
Guest
Judith Maltby

Yes, a much more substantial document indeed. On the background papers: all seem to have an author given except the one entitled ‘Same Sex Marriage’ – or did I miss it?

Gary Paul Gilbert
Guest
Gary Paul Gilbert

This passage toward the end shows that they still don’t understand that their current position is “uncaring and unsympathetic:” “The Archbishop went on to warn that ‘Gay people may once again gain the impression that the church is uncaring and unsympathetic… things could be said in the coming months which could seriously damage people pastorally.’ Some of the members of the Commission suggest that the Church may wish to consider a call to corporate repentance in recognition of its previously negative response to those of homosexual orientation.” Contemplating asking for forgiveness for past mistreatment of LGBTs constitutes a denial of… Read more »

Neville Stephenson
Guest
Neville Stephenson

The Archbishop of Wales is already pushing ahead on this issue without seeking the approval of the Governing Body. Recently one of his priests contracted a civil partnership with his long term same sex partner. The Archbishop then performed a blessing ceremony for the couple.

Martin Reynolds
Guest
Martin Reynolds

Yes, Judith, it was an unintended oversight, this essay is by Will Strange. Will, an international committee member of Anglican Mainstream, also wrote option one in the main report. I too think the report an improvement on anything from England, but that is not a difficult step up, is it? Sadly, the Archbishop refused to appoint an openly gay person, or special advisor to this panel and gave very unconvincing reasons for it, let me give his final email in full: “We had a long discussion at the Bench. The feeling was that we appoint a Doctrinal Commission every three… Read more »

Francis
Guest
Francis

Martin has raised a vital issue which might get lost in the ‘better than England’ euphoria. The Archbishop of Wales is very inconsistent on the issue of same sex relationships, and his email to Martin reflects his capacity for obfuscation. My experience is that his positive public pronouncements don’t always reflect his handling of individual cases (witness the festering sore of the 2008 episcopal election in Bangor where a tragic catalogue of lies about one candidate, which the Archbishop must have known to be untrue, went uncorrected). There is also his consistent discouragement of Jeffrey John’s return to Wales when… Read more »

Gary Paul Gilbert
Guest
Gary Paul Gilbert

Thank you, Martin! It seems unlikely they could not find LGBTs with a broad knowledge about doctrinal issues for the commission. The lack of LGBT representation is appalling. LGBTs are to be talked about but not with, it seems.

Gary Paul Gilbert

Martin Reynolds
Guest
Martin Reynolds

I agree with Francis and unfortunately could add to the stories of “inconsistency”.
What a wicked format for electing bishops which under the cloak of frank exchange allows people to be denounced and defamed with no opportunity for remedy. Oaths of secrecy should be abandoned instantly to expose this appalling abuse.

Of course Gary is quite right. In fact a senior cleric working in England and theologian who has a unique published academic and personal interest in this matter offered himself at my request to be available for the role. What is more he is a welsh speaking Welshman.