Updated
Several commentators have written about these proposals for business school style training programmes for selected clergy. Here are some links, and I will add more as I discover them (or as readers report them to me).
Andrew Lightbown An open letter to Lord Green et al
Richard Murphy Should the Church of England really be taking a lead from Lord Stephen Green?
Rachel Mann ‘These are not the leaders you’re looking for’ – talent pools, management & the C of E
Michael Sadgrove The Next Generation of Church Leaders: thoughts on the Green Report
Updates
“Archbishop Cranmer” Church of England to spend £2m on “new approach” to leadership
Ian Paul Should bishops come from a ‘talent pool’?
Ruth Gledhill Can business training solve CofE’s ‘toxic’ leadership problem?
“Archdruid Eileen” Infecting the Church with Mangerialism
As a former Diocesan Secretary of some 25 years experience who introduced daily prayers into Office life and encouraged staff and visitors to join in when possible, I agree very much with the thrust of Michael Sadgrove’s comments and reference to priorities. We are here to worship God and Bishops are here to teach and help us in this. That is their priority, not management.
As a Quaker, I have sympathy with both sides. Our hierarchy is even flatter than yours. Formally and spiritually, we don’t have one at all. Instead of a CEO we have a Recording Clerk. Servant ministry is at the heart of what we do. BUT, someone has to be the treasurer, the architect, the marriage registrar, the QS, in charge of CRB (or what’s-it-called now), the meeting clerk… and we can’t usually afford to pay for these essential services. These are jobs that take dedication and skill. The organization has to find the right people for them.
I blame the allegedly benign Common Purpose. The C of E is now shot thgrough with its “graduates”…super leaders on the go ..
I assume Bruce that this is what you are referring to. And I note the Bishop of Leicester is chair of the trustees…
http://www.commonpurpose.org.uk/about
The hierarchy of the Church of England would do well to pay close attention to the wise words of the Dean of Durham for fear that we lose sight of our primary purpose. As Team Rector of a large Team Ministry employing a dozen or so people and many more unpaid volunteers I feel, at time, more like a Managing Director than a parish priest. How perceptive Dean Sadgrove is in reminding us that as bishops, deans and incumbents we are head of a religious foundation and not a business organisation.
I was horrified at the suggestion of the proposed ‘officers/managers training school. No sign of allowing the work of the Holy Spirit in leading and calling priests to the office of Bishop. Deans appear to be cast in the role of Management. I know some deans/provosts see this as their role. But try telling that to many Godly Deans such as Salisbury and Glasgow.
As Jesus threw the moneychangers out of the temple, so should this report be cast out into utter darkness.
Not only is the church infected by this madness: even small charities sport a CEO and a business model and are little more than quangos mostly funded by government to whose tune they must therefore dance. Perhaps this should be a lesson to the CofE as it looks to (unholy) parliament to endorse its synodical decisions – and many of its ministers appear to regard ‘bishop’ as the top role in the organisation’s career structure.
If big churches and cathedrals need managers then these should be qualified lay people. Bishops and priests should lead their flock and search out the lost and inspire people to see the beauty of the Gospel through ministering to and evangelising the poor and marginalised. Their leadership should be by trusting in God and the Holy Spirit discerned through regular prayer.
Command and control management models are fascinating, but I can’t help wondering – when applied to the C of E – who is going to be commanded and controlled? Parochial clergy? Parishioners?
You know I really do not see the objection to a business course for clergy. I don’t know how it is in the UK, but on this side of the pond, the rector is usually legally responsible for the fiscal management of the parish. (He may delegate this function to the rector’s warden or financial warden–or both–but legally, he’s the one who will face charges in case of mismanagement.)
Therefore, it makes sense for a priest to have some sense of how to manage a business.
I’ve just watched the programme on Canterbury Cathedral and I’m left wondering if it is the right use of his priestly ministry for the Canon Treasurer to spend so much of his time raising funds for the repair and restoration of the cathedral? Congratulations on Canterbury’s success in being given a grant for £12,000,000 but couldn’t such a task be siphoned off to a suitably qualified lay person, thus freeing the multi-talented Canon Treasurer to concentrate more upon evangelism, (he’s a first rate preacher) mission and ministry?
This old chestnut has something to say to the Green Report. The Twelve Disciples: Were they management potential? Posted on October 3, 2008 4 Votes This isn’t mine but the last reference to it was in 2004 so I thought I would put it up. I got it from “Transforming Discipleship: Making Disciples a Few at a Time” by Greg Ogden – printed in SoJo Mail for 30 October 2003. MEMO TO: JESUS, SON OF JOSEPH, WOODCRAFTER CARPENTER SHOP, NAZARETH FROM: JORDAN MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, JERUSALEM Dear Sir: Thank you for submitting the resumes of the 12 men you have picked… Read more »
In response to the C.T. editorial: ” It is probably notable that, while the word “leader” occurs 171 times in the report, the word “pastor” or “pastoral” does not appear once.” And herein, in my opinion, lies the basic flaw in this scheme to subject 150 ‘whizz-kids’ among the ranks of the clergy of the Church of England, to undertake a management style of training for future leadership in the Church. What sort of leaders will they turn out to be? A like-minded set of bureaucrats, whose business management acumen exceeds that of their pastoral capability? Will the scheme produce… Read more »
Fr David is quite right. I didn’t see the programme about Canterbury but there is a culture in the Church which seems to unable to distinguish between the roles of lay people and clergy. It is much more likely that a lay person will have the sort of organisational powers and experience for major fundraising while the clergy do what they should be able to do best. The ‘father knows best’ which means ‘father should do everything’ is surely one of the curses if the Church.
I am beginning to think that Justin Welby spent too much time in the Oil Industry and not enough time on his knees.
It is jaw-dropping that the advert for ‘Talent Development Manager’ does not contain a Genuine Occupational Requirement that the person be a Christian.
The Canon Treasurer does run what was once called POT Fr David. Canterbury diocese IME 4 to7 is considerably more demanding than in my curacy days..
Is the CofE facing reality with regard business management and starting looking at Parishes as if they were Tesco? If a store doesn’t pay then its closed down. Are they going to look at churches in the same way? We all know the vast majority of churches struggle to keep their heads above water. Over the next 10 years this will only get worse with falling congregations. Just looking round my church on a Sunday morning at the number of older people 70+, I think that in 10 years we will be down by nearly 50%, and I can’t see… Read more »
Judging by the robust defence Pete Broadbent is throwing up one must conclude that the sort of reactions posted here were anticipated.
I thought the reference to the Cundy/Welby essay Dr Edward Prebble mentions on the earlier thread was significant. It deserves careful thought and discussion.
My own view is we need to act immediately.
The age profile Is alarming.
This course should be a must for leaders, especially archdeacons, to help give an impression of improvement, a short term remedy, I know …
http://www.athenabeautyspa.co.uk/training/nonsurgical-facelifts%20.htm
Perry I’m sure that Canterbury’s Canon Treasurer works extremely hard, the cathedral is fortunate to have plucked such a talented priest from Eaton Square. I certainly hope that POT is more rigorous and demanding than it was in the days when I did my potty training. As for the alarming age profile of the clergy – well, we only have ourselves to blame. I was fortunate enough to have been ordained aged 25. In the not too distant past potential young ordinands were told to go away and see something of the “real world” prior to offering themselves for ordination.… Read more »
Official comment from Bishop of Ely on CofE website.
I’ll return to my usual refrain here: by not introducing episcopal elections, this is treating the symptom while ignoring the disease.
Save the two million, and table legislation in General Synod to elect all bishops. How about it, any members of Synod?
Electing bishops is no panacea and in any case this is not what the Green Report is about. For elections to work you need extensive preparation by a committee of those who are to be candidates and detailed information to enable electors to know who they are voting for. There is no evidence that the result is better appointments. Armchair commentators would also do well to read Senior Church Leadership: a resource for reflection (FAOC (2014) 15A) alongside Green. This provides extensive commentary on what leadership is, what the Bible says about leadership and key reminders that the Triune God… Read more »
” It amounts to a wake-up call which might be why many are challenging it.”
I got the impression that many have already provided very sound questions about the process. Martin Percy does not seem to be challenging the idea that change is needed but asks serious questions about that change.
Andrew Lightbown has asked very serious questions from the point of view of a former corporate expert.
It really would help if supporters could engage with those questions rather than simply try to discredit all objectors.
As one educated in an American seminary environment, I can say that many of us wanted some basic education in management. While it’s not the core of the call, I learned long ago that management done poorly inhibits mission. At the same time, as one heavily imbued from long practice in institutional settings, it is important that we be sure first of the preparation of persons for ministry broadly. I work in healthcare with wonderful and compassionate persons who are managers and administrators (MBA’s and the equivalent). Each and every one has been committed to his or her institution providing… Read more »
The more I ponder this, and think what such ‘talent training’ meant in my pre-ordination life and what it might mean for those involved in the church, I find it difficult to see how an ‘ordinary’ parish priest could ever find the time, or the cover, to be talent-trained. I wonder if it will be back to the old system of picking people early and ‘drecting’ them to certain curacies and certain jobs where such cover is possible. I can’t imagine the single-handed urban vicar with three churches will have much chance, but I can imagine that s/he will be… Read more »
No one says that it’s a panacea, Anthony Archer, but it would eliminate (or drastically cut) selection bias, give bishops a mandate, and make dioceses responsible for their choices. In short, it’d end the suffocating paternalism, and make everyone grow up.
Of course, the Church of England may be right, and every other Anglican province wrong, but its current episcopal woes hardly point towards that conclusion, do they?