Thinking Anglicans

New name for merged Changing Attitude and LGCM

Following the recent announcement that LGCM and Changing Attitude are to merge, the two bodies have consulted on a new name for the combined body, which will be known as OneBodyOneFaith.

Details on the background to the choice of name can be read here.

Jeremy Pemberton, Chair of the LGCM Board writes:

We are proud to announce that from 14th February we will be known as

OneBodyOneFaith

We will also use an explicatory strapline to help people locate what we do more easily. This is:

Affirming sexuality and gender in Christ

We will also be unveiling a new logo, and you’ll see a gradul change in our identity online, on social media and in the resources we produce to support our work.

13
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
13 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
robert ian williamsLauri RobertsKateTim MJames Byron Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Kate
Guest
Kate

Good choices

Pluralist
Guest

I dislike the choice of name. Changing Attitude was a loose name that focussed on individual or institutional outlooks. LGCM allowed any definition of ‘Christian’. This OneBodyOneFaith, with the somewhat irritating modern trend for removing spaces, has a sort of ‘Anglicanese’ about it, assuming one Body when there are many bodies, and one Faith when faiths vary, or even varieties of Christianity. It carries an assumption of comprehension, rather than assumption of active toleration.

Giles Fraser
Guest
Giles Fraser

Terrible, terrible name. This is a disaster for both great organisations. Please re-think.

Commentator
Guest
Commentator

How sad that a specifically Christian organisation has given up its name. There are so few places where Christian homosexual men and women can make their voices heard collectively. Organisations already exist for non-Christian gay men and women. I too would ask for a re-think.

Susannah Clark
Guest

I’m not at all sure about this name, Jeremy. I’d suggest a review. ‘One Body One Faith’ could be adopted by almost any Christian group – for example, the advocates of the Anglican Covenant could propose that if you want to be one Body you need ONE faith, therefore uniformity must be insisted on. There doesn’t really seem to be anything in the name that points to gay or lesbian or trans or bi- or intersex people. It just seems a bit bland to me. I’m not sure it’s a good hook for the media to latch on to and… Read more »

Jeremy
Guest
Jeremy

In its favor it positions CA/LGCM well for debates with conservative schismatics.

The TEC experience shows that as majority opinion swings, threats of schism will follow.

Susannah Clark
Guest

I would have preferred ‘Unity in Diversity’.

Or just ‘Christian Diversity’.

Lorenzo
Guest
Lorenzo

It’s like a misprint from a bad hymn

James Byron
Guest
James Byron

I take the point about the problems with alternatives, but much as I want to be enthusiastic, can’t agree with the name: it doesn’t make clear what the organization is; it’s long and complicated; and unlike “Stonewall,” has no clear link with LGBT history. The basic purpose of a name is, surely, instant description and recognition.

Something like Equality Now!, or any of the many excellent suggestions above, would help describe what the organization is, and give its mission.

Tim M
Guest
Tim M

Given the critical juncture the Church of England finds itself at currently, I believe it’s expedient to postpone the relaunch and name change; a few months is all that’s required.

At the moment, LGCM and Changing Attitude need to be speaking up about the issues, not talking about themselves.

Kate
Guest
Kate

“Given the critical juncture the Church of England finds itself at currently, I believe it’s expedient to postpone the relaunch and name change; a few months is all that’s required.

At the moment, LGCM and Changing Attitude need to be speaking up about the issues, not talking about themselves.”

Very, very much agree. The merger should be postponed.

Lauri Roberts
Guest
Lauri Roberts

I feel it is spot on — and even more so with its focussed ‘strapline’. The name positions the organisation in a theologically secure place, while the ‘strapline’ does the same for sexual orientation and gender. Hurraaaah ! When first belonged to lgcm it was then called GCM — times change, names change, but the commitment , the truth, the love goes on. Then I was an ordinand – and now I am a pensioner. Then I was totally at the of the Church of England and now I am a little wiser (I hope), and much happier, living with… Read more »

robert ian williams
Guest
robert ian williams

It’s like the NAACP becoming..the Civility and good manners society…ambiguous title, does not help their cause
.