Saturday, 13 August 2005

letter from Peru

I’m writing this piece some four weeks into a stay in the Diocese of Peru. It’s my first lengthy opportunity to spend time in a part of the Anglican Communion in the global south.

Part of coming here has been not only to see what a sister diocese is doing but also to gain some perspective on my own ministry and priorities, and to see the life of the Church of England from a different viewpoint. The reflections are obviously my own, and equally obviously carry all the naivety that goes with only a month’s exposure.

Being Anglican in this country that is neither English speaking nor a former part of the British Empire is about having a faith that has both the liveliness of some of the more recent Pentecostal missions (usually imported from North America) and the sacramental underpinning and liturgy of Catholicism. There is evidence that this wasn’t always the case. At some points in the past British missionaries have used South America as a place to export both very partial styles of churchmanship that were marginal positions at home and their personal disgruntlement with British Anglicanism too. Mercifully this is no longer prevalent.

To what feels now a very healthy mixture is added a real imperative to work among the poor in both the expanding metropolitan areas and the remote, highly underdeveloped, rural regions. A generation ago, in the time of Gustavo Guttierez, there was much impressive work done by the Roman Catholic Church in taking up the concerns of the marginalised in the urban “pueblos jovenes” or shanties. Sadly, this seems to have been lost through the consistent policy of the previous pope in imposing conservative bishops on the dioceses. Several of the Anglican clergy are themselves former RC priests.

After very difficult times in the period of the Shining Path guerrilla movement Peru has enjoyed more settled years of late. There is evidence all around of the economy growing. The Lima shanties that Henri Nouwen described twenty years ago are now graced by solid houses and tarmac roads. Further out onto the slopes of the mountains new developments of basic shacks repeat what he then described, but the evidence is of communities over time becoming established and gradually edging from grinding poverty to relative poverty. The pattern is similar elsewhere in the country.

This mixture of civil stability and growth is providing a solid foundation on which the church can expand. What a small body such as the Anglican diocese, with no more than a dozen or so churches and a handful of missions in development, can achieve is necessarily limited, but it is being done with real passion in schools, churches, children’s homes, medical clinics, employment training projects and canteens. New church missions are being planted in the most recent and poorest areas, whilst in more established ones existing work is being expanded. Priests and lay workers are being trained in the diocese, and a new seminary to open shortly in Lima (there is already a part time one in Arequipa) will at last allow potential clergy to be trained in a fully Anglican environment. Parish mission teams come from North America and beyond. They experience a week or so in the life of the church here, and help with the practical work of the missions. In many cases when they return home they continue to offer support to the ongoing work.

The church here knows how important it is to be a member of a wider communion. A very significant proportion of time and energy goes into welcoming visitors from other parts of the world. As a small and relatively recently established church it knows how much it benefits from being part of a communion that has many millions of adherents across the globe, and from the insights and experiences of Anglicanism that they bring. I’m sure that many Anglicans here are scarcely aware of what they have to offer in return, not least as a church that is discovering and delighting in an identity and pattern of mission that many of us elsewhere simply take for granted. Moreover, if being deeply, loyally Anglican mattered less then decisions taken by provinces in the global north could be more easily shrugged off.

To be human is to prioritise. There are only so many battles that can be fought at once and only so many areas in which the church can deepen its life. The priorities hare are pretty hard to argue with. They are to build the church, especially in the poorer areas, through good liturgy, lively worship, social action and Christian teaching. And to build it in ways that are coherent with indigenous culture and sustainable into the long term; avoiding overdependence on the particular gifts and preferences of the small number of overseas personnel that might be working here at any particular time. In Peru at least, the increasing role of women as sole providers for their families, and the presence of a small number of women deacons, suggests that the ground is being prepared for future debate about gender inequalities in the church and beyond. However any idea that the church here either could or should get itself into a position to open up a wider debate on sexuality issues is pretty far fetched.

Earlier this week I stood overlooking the Colca Canyon as a Peruvian Anglican priest pointed out the remote villages, with neither electricity nor roads, on the opposite side. It takes him several days to complete a circuit of them on foot. It took the pair of us six hours and one breakdown on a rickety bus to even reach this point. It took as long with two breakdowns to get back again. It’s a long way geographically from a diocese in Central England where I can be in any of 280 church buildings in less than an hour from home. And some of the pressing issues may seem very different too. But what I am experiencing here is both prayerfully thoughtful and essentially Anglican.

Posted by David Walker on Saturday, 13 August 2005 at 6:54pm BST
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: just thinking

Nice letter, thank you David Walker.

Greeting to all from the Diocese of Guatemala in Central America (I'm not a clergy person) where I am currently exploring possible locations to live in my retirement (I lived here five years before and I love Central America and Guatemala).

When reading Davids letter/report from Peru it seemed like he was describing rural life in Guatemala.

Women here run the homes/do "business" and provide the moral/physical "strength" necessary for family continuity/survival/stability often because of rampant alcoholism active in "Dad"...simple as that. Take away alcoholism and you have hard working men who do not go off on drunken/sexual tangents/binges or abandon their families while throwing away the family would be incorrect to think MEN here aren't hard working and God loving (mostly Roman Catholics with *others* like Epsicopalian/Anglicans mixed in too)...they work from dawn to dusk quite literally and earn small wages (mostly)...they are poor.

Last weekend I went into the rural, farming mountainous/volcanic countryside areas seeking a "lotte" to build a little house for myself...I visited many villages/ the tiny villages there are many old colonial type small Catholic Churchs (usually only a priest once a week for a quickie mass I'm told) but I ALSO noticed a few little churches with "Fundamentalist" U.S. "parent denominations" popping up here and there...the folks here are "churched" people being converted by other Christian denominations.

The desperately poor/struggling with health issues are willing to be HELPED and healed by anyone it seems...doesn't seem unreasonable to me to accept help when one is needy.

Pretending Homosexuality isn't a "issue" in this part of the "third world" is simply validating more denial/fantasy and unfortunate and dangerous double standard lies.

GLBT are present at every level of society in Latin America (and everywhere else too)...being GLBT and trying to live together harmoniously with "heterosexuals" in a "church" community (pueblo or city) is NOT only a RICH GLBT persons dilemma/stuggle/challenge...GLBT are UNDERGROUND everywhere and quite often that secretive "life" and behavior twists emotions and individuals horribly.

I believe it is time for ALL OF US in our Epsicopal/Anglican church to deal with REAL character and health issues OPENLY and STOP beating drums of ignorance and hate/shame in regard to a persons "God given" sexual orientation...loving the marginalized requires a wide brush when viewing ALL reality and human sexuality. The alternative is more alcoholism, drug addiction/death, family dysfunction/destruction, spouce/child beating/abandoning, physical sickness and more ignorance and hate/guilt crimes.

Simply being a "Welcoming" Church (without recriminations/blame/shame) to EVERYONE including our GLBT friends/families is where brotherly and sisterly Christian love begins.

We are all alike, come and see.

Leonardo Ricardo

Posted by: Leonardo Ricardo on Monday, 15 August 2005 at 6:58pm BST

Thank you for that, Leonardo. I'm glad you said what you did, and you put it so well. I too raised an eyebrow at that little line ("However any idea that the church here either could or should get itself into a position to open up a wider debate on sexuality issues is pretty far fetched") in David Walker's interesting letter. I'm not saying it should be 'debated', but what kind of 'anglicanism' is being inculcated there when certain elements of the community appear to be considered irrelevant?

Also, what does this mean: 'Moreover, if being deeply, loyally Anglican mattered less then decisions taken by provinces in the global north could be more easily shrugged off'? What's that about?

I was wondering what 'flavour' of anglicanism/christianity was being carried by the missionaries in Peru that David Walker mentions. I think Leonardo's Guatemalan perspective and aspects of David's letter hold clues as to what flavour it might be.

Hopefully, the Peruvians' difficult history with 'religions' has imbued them with a healthy scepticism and independence of thought.

Posted by: matt on Tuesday, 16 August 2005 at 2:50am BST

Well, to partially answer matt's question, I know that the (in)famous Christ Church Plano (Texas), an extremely evangelical, reactionary "conservative" church* that's active in the American Anglican Council, etc..., is very involved with missionary work in Peru.

* Think of it as the "Holy Trinity, Brompton" of Dallas, TX.

Posted by: Simeon on Tuesday, 16 August 2005 at 2:39pm BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.