The following statistics were supplied at the press briefing for the November 2005 meeting of the General Synod, held on 21 October.
New General Synod. Figures as at October 2005
Age profile of elected diocesan representatives
20s |
30s |
40s |
50s |
60s |
70s |
Average |
Average in 2000 |
||
| Laity | 189 |
9 |
14 |
22 |
62 |
70 |
12 |
56 |
53 |
| Clergy |
182 |
2 |
8 |
74 |
79 |
19 |
0 |
50 |
51 |
Clergy average age reflects the clergy population as a whole.
Gender balance by Houses
|
Female |
Male |
Total | |||
| Laity | 84 |
41% |
120 |
59% |
204 |
| Clergy | 46 |
23% |
154 |
77% |
200 |
| Bishops | 0 |
0% |
53 |
100% |
53 |
| Total | 130 |
28% |
327 |
72% |
457 |
These figures exclude 9 voting places not currently filled – 6 Bath and Wells laity, 1 religious community laity, Third Estates Commissioner and one appointed Archbishops’ Council place occupied by a diocesan bishop. They also exclude the 10 places available, but rarely filled, for co-opted voting members, and the 13 observer places for deaf, ecumenical and youth representatives.
Gender balance by Houses January 2001
|
Female |
Male |
Total | |||
| Laity | 117 |
45% |
145 |
55% |
262 |
| Clergy | 27 |
11% |
227 |
89% |
254 |
| Bishops | 0 |
0% |
54 |
100% |
54 |
| Total | 144 |
25% |
426 |
75% |
570 |
(These figures exclude 1 voting place not filled - one appointed Archbishops’ Council place occupied by a diocesan bishop. They also exclude 10 places available, but rarely filled, for co-opted voting members and 8 observer places for ecumenical representatives.)
Posted by Peter Owen on Sunday, 23 October 2005 at 5:00pm BSTPeter
Has there been any analysis of whether Synod has shifted theologically?
Posted by: Ian Paul on Thursday, 27 October 2005 at 8:23pm BSTI've not seen anything. One difficulty in carrying out such an analysis is the refusal of many dioceses to release copies of candidates' election addresses.
Posted by: Peter Owen on Thursday, 27 October 2005 at 10:15pm BSTIan
I understand that those actually elected have been sent a questionnaire by the Synod Office designed to elicit information about them that might be helpful to the Appointments Committee. I don't know what questions were asked, and apparently there is no compulsion to answer them, but an analysis of these might conceivably give some further clues. However, I also understand that the questions do not include any that relate to the members' opinions, but rather cover their background and experience.
My own particular interest is in their occupation (lawyers, accountants, etc.) I think it's also of public interest also to know how many of the House of Laity are spouses/partners of clergy.
Having participated in the election myself, I have seen a number of election addresses. I did not always find it easy to discern the real theological views of the candidates from what they had written. They are after all election addresses :-)
Simon