Wednesday, 30 November 2005

British press views of Roman Catholic statement

The Guardian today carried three items:
A news report by Stephen Bates Vatican rules firmly against gay priests
A magazine article by Emily Wilson How gay is too gay?
A leader: Distinctly without prejudice
Update see also Thursday’s letters to the editor

The Independent had a report: Pope restates ban on gay priests and says homosexuality is ‘disordered’

The Times had this: Pope’s gay priest ruling is hailed by moderates by Ruth Gledhill and Richard Owen

And in the Telegraph Jonathan Petre reported under the headline Vatican call to weed out practising gays

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Wednesday, 30 November 2005 at 11:08pm GMT
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: News
Comments

I never thought that I should find a reason to write this: - What an excellent leader the Guardian has produced!

Posted by: Peter on Thursday, 1 December 2005 at 10:01am GMT

Peter wrote: "I never thought that I should find a reason to write this: - What an excellent leader the Guardian has produced!"

Guardian readers don't seem to agree: see their letter's in today's paper at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,3604,1654474,00.html

Posted by: badman on Thursday, 1 December 2005 at 4:24pm GMT

"A curious thing, in all this, is that lesbians really do not get much of a mention (apart from the four lesbian rabbis to whom Rabbi Rich lays claim); it is all very Queen Victoria. When the Anglican church frets over gay vicars, it is really men and men's bits it is worrying about. What about all those gay nuns and gay lady vicars out there? People just tend to 'fret' less about what women get up to, says Reynolds."

An interesting comment by Emily Wilson in The Guardian.

Posted by: John Henry on Thursday, 1 December 2005 at 7:19pm GMT

I thought it was twaddle - the responses in today's letters column made a lot more sense!

Posted by: Merseymike on Thursday, 1 December 2005 at 8:27pm GMT

Again -- have to agree with Merseymike -- I thought the Guardian leader must have been sneaked in from some other paper!

Ditto the responses re: badman

John Henry -- the secret is that the emotion laden controversy is not really about same sex intimacy -- it is about preserving patriarchy

Posted by: Prior Aelred on Friday, 2 December 2005 at 1:18am GMT

Four irritated voices on the leading left-wing national paper, against the "socialist-elite" leader article. The wind has changed quite a bit, and the revisionists on TA are not happy, not happy at all!

Posted by: Peter on Friday, 2 December 2005 at 3:08pm GMT

"John Henry -- the secret is that the emotion laden controversy is not really about same sex intimacy -- it is about preserving patriarchy."

Good point, Prior Aelred .

Was the dissolution of the monasteries during the 1530s of the Reformation Era also about preserving "patriarchy"? It is significant that the reforming European states also enacted the first "anti-sodomy legislation" during that time.
Nuns in convents had access to education. Abbesses wore mitres as symbols of their authority and equality. In reformed states nuns were forced to marry former monks in order to survive. Hateful propaganda also associated homosexuality with monasticism. Geneva, under Jean (John) Calvin, rigorously enforced the new anti-sodomy laws.

There is so much 16th century Calvinism in ++Akinola and his ilk!

Posted by: John Henry on Friday, 2 December 2005 at 5:18pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.