Friday, 16 December 2005

Transcripts of Proceedings

Transcripts of Proceedings are now available for the November meeting of General Synod.

Tuesday
Wednesday morning
Wednesday afternoon

The last of these contains the answers to all questions reached before close of business. The answers to the questions not reached are here.

The July 2005 Report of Proceedings (in PDF format) has recently become available online here.

Posted by Peter Owen on Friday, 16 December 2005 at 7:45pm GMT
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: General Synod
Comments

INTERESTING QUESTION ON NON-GEOGRAPHICAL BISHOPS

I think this excerpt addresses rather well two of our ongoing debates on TA about ECUSA... Who defines what the church is, and what it believes ? And can a Bishop legitimately sack a dissenting priest, or close a church, if they are dissenting on the grounds of a change away from scriptural/traditional Christian and Anglican teaching ?

Revd Canon Karen Gorham (Canterbury): There appears to be increasing pressure from parishes, networks, wanting to choose their own doctrinally compatible bishop. Has the Act of Synod and the introduction of PEVs set a precedent for a new understanding of episcopacy where the diocesan bishop’s rĂ´le is no longer seen as an instrument of unity?

The Bishop of Rochester: We need to begin by saying that what unites the Church is not the figure of the bishop, important as that may be; it is the faith of the Apostles. The bishop is there, as we have already heard from our panellists, to safeguard and transmit that faith and to make sure that it becomes intelligible in whatever context the Church finds itself. That is what keeps the Church together; bishops are only a means. Where bishops become as it were the end, that is where things go wrong with Churches: you get episcopal tyranny. I would say that what we need first of all is bishops and everyone else acknowledging the authority of the apostolic teaching, and then we will not have the sort of fragmentation that the questioner clearly fears.

Amen to that!

Posted by: Dave on Saturday, 17 December 2005 at 3:48pm GMT

So much for flying bishops, then....

Posted by: Merseymike on Monday, 19 December 2005 at 3:41pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.