The report of the House of Bishops’ Women Bishops Group (the Guildford Report) is released today and is online here. The report’s principal conclusions are copied below the fold.
This morning’s BBC Radio 4 Today programme carried an interview with Christina Rees and the Bishop of Fulham about the report. Listen to it with Real Audio (6m 03s)
Update
The official press release on the Guildford Report is here. Note that this includes the introductory remarks made at the press conference (scroll down).
Important related document:
Note by the Presidents (GS 1605A) is here. An html copy is here.
More Updates - initial press reports
BBC partial transcript of the interview mentioned above
BBC Compromise plan on women bishops
BBC video report (2 minutes) Church compromise on women bishops
BBC Robert Pigott Anglicans get women bishops plan
Reuters Paul Majendie Anglicans could have woman spiritual head
Press Association Martha Linden Door opens for first female Archbishop of Canterbury
Guardian Stephen Bates Church seeks compromise over women bishops
The Times Ruth Gledhill ‘Tea time’ report on women bishops sets up Synod battle
Also, an earlier report by Jonathan Petre in the Telegraph that seems pretty accurate in the light of today’s press conference: ‘Robust’ meeting ends with bishops stalling at letting women join their ranks
Guildford Report
SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS
My initial thought is that repealing the part of the Act that allows individual churches to remain in the geographic dioceses and yet publicly not have female clergy of one kind or the other (i.e. Resolutions A, B and C) is going to be more structurally divisive then the HoB thinks. It forces churches who oppose to take a more fractious stance (applying for TEA). Allowing churches to remain within geographic dioceses and yet still having Resolutions A, B or C is more cohesive. The arrangements above could be interpreted as "If you still oppose women's ordination you cannot remain within the geographic dioceses".
Posted by: Peter O on Monday, 16 January 2006 at 3:47pm GMTI think that may be one reason why the HoB, as opposed to the Guildford Group, is so divided about the proposal. It appears that there is no majority in the HoB for the content of the TEA recommendation, but only a majority (a clear majority we were told today by Christopher Hill) for having further discussion on the merits or otherwise of the proposal. Those opposed to the content would be likely to include both those bishops opposed to the whole idea, and those bishops who think it is too "conservative" a proposal. The question is whether a majority will emerge by July in favour of this particular proposal.
Posted by: Simon Sarmiento on Monday, 16 January 2006 at 4:24pm GMT