Monday, 6 February 2006

Octavia Hill Estates

Last Friday, the Church Commissioners made a decision to sell their remaining holdings of property in the Octavia Hill Estates. The press release announcing this decision is here:
Church Commissioners select buyer for London residential properties.

This action was opposed before the decision was taken, and continues to be opposed by a variety of groups. Some reports on this:
Ekklesia Church of England accused of acting unethically over homes sale
LondonSE1 Waterloo and Union Street homes sold by Church Commissioners
BBC MPs’ shock at church homes sale and Protest on church homes sell-off
Guardian Archbishop intervenes in row over £200m estates sale. Octavia Hill residents stage protest over Church of England’s decision to sell homes

A letter, from the three MPs whose constituents are affected by this, to all members of the synod was issued today, and the text of it appears in full below the fold.

To: All members of the General Synod

6 February 2006

Dear Member of Synod,

Re: Sale of Church Commissioners’ properties in Walworth, Vauxhall and Waterloo

We are writing to you to express our concerns about the decision to sell properties in Walworth, Vauxhall and Waterloo to Grainger Trust and Geninvest taken by the Assets Committee of the Church Commissioners on Friday 3rd February 2006.

This decision to ignore the bid from a registered social landlord which would have guaranteed the future security of residents in these homes is deplorable. We are angry and disappointed that the Church Commissioners have betrayed their tenants and have shown disdain for their ethical responsibilities.

For over a hundred years the Church of England has played a key role in providing social housing to low income families as an expression of its commitment to social justice.

The difference in the sale of these properties to a registered social landlord rather than a private developer, would be insignificant in comparison to the £4.3 billion worth of assets that the Church Commissioners manage, and the Church of England pensions assets of over £500 million.

We call on the General Synod to condemn this sell off and instead instruct the Asset committee to sell to a social landlord.

Yours faithfully,

Harriet Harman MP
Camberwell and Peckham

Kate Hoey MP

Simon Hughes MP
North Southwark & Bermondsey

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Monday, 6 February 2006 at 11:26pm GMT
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England | General Synod

I am afraid that I must diassociate myself from the comments made by the three local MP's re the sale by the Church Commissioners of the Octavia Hill Estates.
The result of the sale other than 100% to a Housing Association has been to generate additional capital, which on re-investment secures additional income for the Commissioners to distribute.
The question that has to be considered is the eventual use of this money a better use for the Church than effectively being used as a perpetual subsidy for the Estate.
As long as it emerges as part of the Commissioners Church Mission Fund then yes I believe that this will be a better use. More communities will benefit and the money will be used more pro-actively for both those communities and the Church.

Posted by: Adrian Collier on Thursday, 21 September 2006 at 12:31pm BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.