Monday, 3 July 2006

Butler-Coekin letter

A very belated posting. For previous posting on this topic see here.

The Diocese of Southwark website has Bishop’s letter re Rev Richard Coekin as a PDF file. The letter is dated 15 June. The full text is below the fold.

To all licensed clergy, churchwardens, members of the Bishop’s Council, members of the Diocesan Synod, members of the Ministry and Training Committee.

Dear Colleagues,
As many of you know last November, following an unauthorised ordination, I removed the Revd Richard Coekin’s licence as an honorary assistant curate at Emmanuel Church Wimbledon, which is a proprietary chapel. In practice he has for some years been exercising ministry at Dundonald Church – a congregation meeting at Dundonald School in South Wimbledon. This originated as a plant from Emmanuel. He appealed against the revocation to the Archbishop of Canterbury and, after a court hearing by the Bishop of Winchester, the Archbishop upheld the appeal. With the various press reports concerning the appeal, I thought that it might be helpful for you to have my response.

I note that the Archbishop, in his determination, states that “Mr Coekin’s conduct [in arranging a Church of England in South Africa ordination in a Church of England parish church without reference to the Archbishop or Diocesan Bishop] merited censure.” The Church of England in South Africa is not in communion with the Anglican Communion.

I note further that the Archbishop, whilst cancelling the revocation of the licence for essentially technical reasons, states that he (the Archbishop) “does not accept that the requested undertakings [for such a cancellation as recommended by the Bishop of Winchester’s report] are unreasonable or unjustifiable.” [These undertakings are:

(i) except under the authority of the Bishop of Southwark to refrain from any involvement in:

a) ordination services within the area of the Diocese of Southwark, or

b) the ordination of persons (of whatever Christian church) to serve within the area of that diocese.

(ii) strictly to abide by all general or specific directions given by the Bishop of Southwark, concerning church planting or mission initiatives.]

In this, the Archbishop makes it clear that the content of these recommended undertakings “reflects the legal obligations which Canon law imposes upon any licensed minister.”

The Archbishop’s report further emphasises that if Mr Coekin is to exercise licensed ministry in the Church of England he must “conform to the discipline of the Church” and “must submit to the Bishop of Southwark’s episcopal authority.”

The Archbishop points to the commitment of the whole Church of England to its mission as the national Church. The Archbishop points to the forthcoming Dioceses, Pastoral and Mission Measure, (which places an important emphasis on Bishops’ mission orders that govern mission initiatives).

Within these understandings, I will be looking to Mr Coekin to work in partnership with the Diocese and with all of its other clergy.

The reason Mr Coekin gave for proceeding with the unauthorised ordinations was my refusal to distance myself from the House of Bishop’s Statement on Civil Partnerships, although during the hearing it became clear that plans for the ordination had been made in March 2005, several months before the Bishops’ Statement had been produced. (For the same reason it is reported that two ordinands in the Diocese of London have decided not to proceed to being ordained by the Bishop of London).

You may be interested to know that in the Diocese of Southwark we have meticulously followed the process set down by the House of Bishops’ Pastoral Statement concerning clergy who have indicated that they wish to engage in a civil partnership. There have been a small number of such cases and all the clergy involved have met with their Area Bishop who has drawn to their attention the expectation that their relationship will be consistent with the teaching set out in Issues in Human Sexuality.

With best wishes,
Grace and Peace,
+Thomas Southwark

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Monday, 3 July 2006 at 3:57pm BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England
Comments

I do wish that Bishops would stop trying to restrict existing effective initiatives from below; whilst at the same time protesting that they want to create "fresh expressions"!! Several initiatives like Co-Mission are already working and being effective at bringing people into the kingdom of God! Why not encourage them, and change the heirarchy to accommodate them ?

Who is the Church ? Who is supposed to be serving whom ?

Posted by: Dave on Monday, 3 July 2006 at 10:54pm BST

"Who is the Church ? Who is supposed to be serving whom ?"

If it's true that the denomination which became involved in the Coekin affair was one which was at least passively supportive of apartheid, perhaps they could do a church plant in (say) Oldham. Now there's a Fresh Expression which might go down a wow.

But less mischievously, isn't Church Order important? It must be significant that the condemnation of Richard Coekin's actions came from all shades of theology and churchpersonship, not just the limp-wristed liberals and the rancid catholics (among which latter bunch I number myself).

Unfettered free-market economics are likely to be as destructive when applied to the Church as when applied to industry. I know of a fervent evangelical church which was doing a good job, both serving its community and doing all the conservative & charismatic evangelical things — until it was suddenly 'gazumped' by an unauthorised church plant. Is that really the way we want to go, that fearful looking-over-the-shoulder in case of a predatory 80's stock exchange hostile takeover bid?

Posted by: mynsterpreost on Tuesday, 4 July 2006 at 9:41am BST

Does the tone of this letter suggest that the man who wrote it is prayerfully seeking reconciliation with another Christian? If it does then Christianity is dead in this country or rather it is dead within the Church of England.

Posted by: Rupert Standring on Tuesday, 4 July 2006 at 10:38am BST

May I assure mynsterpreost, from my eyrie in the depths of Oldham, that we would welcome an "unauthorised" church plant into this parish from any denomination who will come and get involved and preach the gospel of Jesus Christ. I, as a lowly parish priest, am all for free market economics in evangelism. Oldham has plenty of non-believers in Jesus to go around.

The parish I serve in has 15,000 people and is growing rapidly. There are three paid clergy serving here - me (Anglican), a Methodist and an RC priest. There's room for many more.

You can't gazump us! We'll welcome Christian brothers and sisters with open arms as we seek to serve this large and deprived inner urban community.

I gather Southwark is not much different (I'm thinking of spiritual deprivation).

Posted by: John Simmons on Tuesday, 4 July 2006 at 5:42pm BST

"....the condemnation of Richard Coekin's actions came from all shades of theology and churchpersonship..."

Yes tragically, jealousy and envy infect the hearts of us all. And when they do, repentance is the only godly choice.

Posted by: Neil B on Wednesday, 5 July 2006 at 11:41pm BST

Rupert - keep up the good work. I have always thought it self-evident that if we focus on the priorities of Jesus rather than those of church politics, we will not be sidetracked. And, yes, the priorities of Jesus do include speaking the truth without fear or favour.

Posted by: Christopher Shell on Thursday, 6 July 2006 at 9:08am BST

Will someone let Tom Butler know that he lost....and caused the ABC a lot of trouble as a result of his actions

Posted by: NP on Friday, 7 July 2006 at 7:30am BST
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.