Monday, 27 November 2006

the figleaf of "reception"

The penetrating analysis of the Catholic Herald interview, and its spinoffs in the Telegraph and The Times, that appeared in the Church Times, is now on public view: Press: What Dr Williams didn’t mean by Andrew Brown.

Everyone who has followed the story of women priests knows that every archbishop has to pretend that there is a chance that the decision to ordain women might be reversed. That is the figleaf of “reception”, which allows Forward in Faith and Reform, in their turn, to pretend to be part of the Church of England.

You may think that this is a silly bargain, but it is the one that the Synod and the Church as a whole have signed up to. This is well understood by all the journalists who, despite that, wrote last week’s story as if it were significantly true: Ruth Gledhill, Jonathan Petre, and its originator, Damian Thompson. They all covered the vote in 1992. Ruth, on her blog, and Jonathan, in the course of his story, made it quite clear that they saw no truth in their own headlines.

Much of the Catholic Herald material has rotated off its website. But you can still find the interview itself here (third URL since inception).

And also, there was this article by Damian Thompson which appeared in the Guardian No wonder the Archbishop of Canterbury chose to speak to us. For background on another Catholic Herald columnist go here.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Monday, 27 November 2006 at 3:45pm GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England

I like the idea of reception as a way of imaging a different future. But I wouldnt see it as a monolithic proces. Don't forget fig-leaves may rise waving at us ! .

I think this reception began in 1943 when Florence Lee Tim Oi was priested by the bishop of Hong Kong, for the sake of pastoral necessity, in war torn lands. An Oriental solution to a western problem perhaps

Posted by: laurence on Monday, 27 November 2006 at 7:29pm GMT


OOh, I can almost taste the blood, Simon ...

Andrew Brown at his best.

Posted by: Martin Reynolds on Monday, 27 November 2006 at 9:18pm GMT
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.