Thursday, 27 December 2007

Telegraph supports bishops

In a surprising move, the Daily Telegraph has published a leader comment in favour of Church of England bishops. Commenting on a news article by its own Religious Affairs Correspondent, Jonathan Petre, headlined One in five C of E bishops faces sack, the leader says:

Don’t knock the Church of England’s bishops

When, in 1942, Winston Churchill nominated William Temple for Canterbury, he remarked that he had chosen the only half-crown article in a sixpenny bazaar.

That was too harsh on the bishops of the time, but how does the bishops’ bazaar compare today?

In monetary terms, their services are less valued now. A diocesan bishop receives £36,230 a year, and an auxiliary suffragan bishop only £29,560.

That is less than a teacher, though we expect great things of bishops.

But, as we report today, instead of finding ways of attracting better candidates, perhaps by increasing the amount they receive to a level where they might no longer wonder how to pay for the children’s shoes, the Church Commissioners, in a secret document, have recommended that more than a fifth of bishops should simply be abolished.

Some dioceses might also go, or be merged. There is talk of selling off historic palaces.

No one is underestimating the difficulties facing the Church of England. Its full-time clergy have diminished in the past century from 24,000 to 9,000. Parishes are amalgamated, and churches crumble and are closed.

The apparent decline reflects lay secularisation, but also a reduced status for clergy. This leads to a diminished pool of talent from which bishops may be drawn.

The solution is not to bash the bishops once more. Real savings should come from trimming a proliferating bureaucracy, not from cutting bishops’ incomes.

As for selling off historic palaces, that is an abdication of trust and a pointless transfer of historic property to unreliable custodians.

A success story for the Church of England has been its cathedrals: well attended and able to draw in those previously little interested in Christianity.

One model for the C of E’s future is the building of central teams in dioceses, flexible and mobile enough to meet local needs. This is no time to weaken episcopal vigour.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Thursday, 27 December 2007 at 3:41pm GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England
Comments

Actually, reducing the number of bishops to enable an increase in pay as well as to reflect the declining size of their flocks doesn't seem at all unreasonable to me -- archdeacons can help out a lot on the administrative side, can't they?

Posted by: Prior Aelred on Thursday, 27 December 2007 at 8:13pm GMT

Get real these are huge sums of money -- on this stipend their children will not go unshod.


Cut the bishops' stipends and raise standards !

Posted by: L Roberts on Friday, 28 December 2007 at 10:52pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.