Wednesday, 30 April 2008

Better coverage of the Manchester report

In the Daily Telegraph George Pitcher has written an article headlined Rowan Williams will not be driven out of office which is in fact about the Manchester report. It also rather debunks most earlier reports. (And it is not written by the newly appointed religion specialist.)

…As ever, the truth is somewhat different. Deeply considered (and, I might say, deeply boring) documentation has been published at Church House, morsels are torn from its body and partially digested, and those with corners to fight duly back into them, barking.

The Bishop of Manchester, the Rt Rev Nigel McCulloch, as chair of the numbingly named Legislative Drafting Group, has offered up a typically chewy tome.

In it, far from proposing a church like a Victorian playground, with gates marked in stone for Boys and Girls, he offers three approaches to the introduction of women bishops: a simple change in the law with no alternative arrangements for those who demur; legislation that would make some special arrangements for those “unable to receive the ministry of women bishops”; and, finally, legislation that would create structures for these conscientious objectors.

The group is at pains to say that it’s not offering a recommendation, but analysing the pros and cons of each approach.

To infer from this that the church is set to split itself along gender lines is, at best, ambitious. But what is important is the difference between what is said in this report, which is dull, and what is perceived to have been said…

The Times has some letters.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 at 8:22am BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England

Added to the clause: Those in conscience who cannot accept the ministry of women, should be added "and those men ordained by them." This is no longer a female discrimination issue.

That is why the apartheid solution is appalling.

The "theological commission" of FIF should be challenged...will you recognise male bishops, who were ordained as priests by women and consecrated with their participation.


Posted by: Robert ian Williams on Thursday, 1 May 2008 at 6:51am BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.