Friday, 20 June 2008

Church Services after Civil Partnerships

InclusiveChurch press release

Church Services after Civil Partnerships

20th June 2008

InclusiveChurch today publishes a paper by Revd Brian Lewis, a member of General Synod and of IC’s Executive Committee on the law in relation to services after Civil Partnerships. The paper demonstrates that under the laws of the Church of England – especially Canon B5 - clergy have far greater liberty in this area than is commonly thought. They are permitted to carry out services of prayer and dedication following a civil partnership so long as they are not deemed to be “Services of Blessing”. The paper is available here, or here as a PDF file.

Canon Giles Goddard, Chair of Inclusive Church, said “We very much welcome this long overdue clarification of the law. It makes the distinction between marriages and civil partnerships and sets out what is permissible within the terms of Canon B5. We hope it will be helpful for clergy wishing to provide public services which respond prayerfully and pastorally to the needs of their congregations.”

The Revd Brian Lewis makes the comparison with the Service of Prayer and Dedication following a Civil Wedding (popularly described as a “A Church Blessing”). In these services the individuals are blessed without the service becoming “a Service of Blessing”.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Friday, 20 June 2008 at 6:15pm BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England | InclusiveChurch
Comments

What an horrendous piece of casuistry this is from Revd Lewis, worthy of a 1st century Pharisee: The bishops say no to services of blessing after civil partnerships; but we CAN have services that look exactly like weddings; as long as we don't CALL them 'services of blessing' (though they can still contain blessings, all the same). What?!

If it is that easy to break Canon Law then there is no hope for trust, order, and discipline in the Church of England, and no hope for those Anglican clergypeople who find it so easy to circumvent church rules. Who would even buy a used car from someone who found it this easy to say one thing but mean another?

Posted by: Pharisee Gamaliel on Sunday, 22 June 2008 at 5:17pm BST

Pharisee Gamaliel

"If it is that easy to break Canon Law ..."

What Brian Lewis is arguing is precisely that Canon Law does allow room for certain kinds of service to be conducted. He does not seem to comment at all on the specific circumstances of this case, or whether it falls within the category of permitted services he suggests.

And on blessings and 'a service of blessing' - I include a blessing in every funeral service I conduct. No-one would sensibly call that 'a service of blessing'.

Posted by: Mark Bennet on Sunday, 22 June 2008 at 9:58pm BST

"Clergypeople' GHASTLY

What is wrong with "Clergy"

and please why not "cleric" - he/she is a cleric

Various clerics.....


Posted by: Michael Thompson on Monday, 23 June 2008 at 9:13am BST
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.