Friday, 25 December 2009

Relishing the Divine Glory

I belong to that generation who, back in the seventies, were theologically weaned off Christmas in favour of Easter’s role as the pivotal celebration of Christian faith. So convinced were we, that it seems odd to be attracted back to Christmas, to be called to contemplate the Incarnation anew.

No doubt, in forming the infancy narratives, Matthew and Luke were anticipating what happened in Jesus’s adult life, anticipating the significance of that later life — much as John did via his quite different prologue. They expected us to be better able to understand the later life by understanding the early life — written creatively to show the hand of God active from Jesus’s very beginnings.

Once you suspect what the evangelists were up to, it is horribly tempting to make theological hay about how God is revealed in the exquisite vulnerability of a newborn infant; in a child of unusual, if not uncertain, birth; in a rejected child, soon to be persecuted, soon to become a refugee. The clear anticipation of the pattern of Jesus’s later life is almost too obvious. But good theology stems, at least in part, from good prayer; and the challenge of re-appropriating Christmas is perhaps more than getting the hermeneutics or the theology right. The greater challenge is to think a little bit less and to wonder a whole lot more. In his notion of the second naiveté, Paul Ricoeur spoke of the need to let the creative aspects of these stories strike us, even with our critical reading strategies.

That’s why I like to ponder the verse in Matthew depicting the Magi falling to their knees, or the verse in Luke saying how the shepherds went back to their fields glorifying and praising God. As Ignatius of Loyola said, ‘it is not much knowledge but the inner feeling and relish of things that fills and satisfies the soul.’ Perhaps Christmas is an invitation to put theology temporarily on the back seat, and to try to let these stories tell themselves. The evangelists had their purposes in passing on these stories, but those purposes were served by these stories themselves, not by a study of the evangelists’ motivations. Perhaps rather than try to explain the significance of Jesus’s birth, we’d be better off asking God to let us experience that significance, to be bowled over by it, to hear, as if for the first time, just how this utterly surprising birth could be a great joy for the whole world. Again, rather than worry too quickly about the two natures of Christ, we could first ask God to let us taste and relish the divine glory as we re-imagine that infant’s birth. Who knows, we may find ourselves flopping to our knees, just as the Magi purportedly did.

Theology can wait another day.

Joe Cassidy is Principal of St Chad’s College, Durham University.

Posted by Joe Cassidy on Friday, 25 December 2009 at 5:50am GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: just thinking
Comments

Gee what meanness to be talked away from Christmas in favor of Easter Day ... can one ever be separated from the other, any more than Jesus parables can be sorted out from his healing ministries? That seems wrong-headed, and callous to boot. Glad a person can recover from something like that.

Problem with surrendering to wonder and awe in Advent is not the wonder or awe; but the several different camps and people waiting to grab your mind and heart when you are most vulnerable, and skew things this way and that way to suit their own Anglican evangelical or anglo-catholic campaigning purposes. The open space in our global big tent really has been gassed up with way too much polarized stuff from both of these groups, alas, Lord have mercy. My coping strategy has so far been to move awe and wonder outside the war zones of these small tent campers, and their sadistic-bloodthirsty sense of transcendence and salvation and deity.

Posted by: drdanfee on Friday, 25 December 2009 at 10:05pm GMT

Thanks, Dan, for that comment. I think what you said in your last line was what I was trying to say via my several paragraphs. Awe and wonder keep us closer to grace than our own supposed righteousness....

Posted by: Joe on Saturday, 26 December 2009 at 9:31am GMT

"rather than worry too quickly about the two natures of Christ, we could first ask God to let us taste and relish the divine glory as we re-imagine that infant’s birth. Who knows, we may find ourselves flopping to our knees, just as the Magi purportedly did." - Joe Cassidy -

Thank you, Joe, for this humanisation of the oft mis-understood Christmas reality - that God, in Christ, became human like us. The great mystery of divinity in humanity is so simply, and yet so beautifully, told in the Gospels of Luke and Matthew; and yet we clergy try, so often, to enwrap it all in theological jargon - a process which can only serve to mystify unduly the wonderful story that children take for granted.

Perhaps at Christmas-tide we all need to dissemble and wait upon the glorious revelation that child-birth and nurture tells us about the wonder of The Creator becoming part of Creation. Deo Gratias!

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Saturday, 26 December 2009 at 6:30pm GMT

A blessed Advent to All. El dia de los Reyes llegara muy pronto, despues. Feliz Navidad.

Posted by: drdanfee on Saturday, 26 December 2009 at 9:37pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.