Friday, 12 March 2010

Equality Bill: Church Times coverage

There is a leader today, Legal protection for clerical consciences.

A LITTLE historical perspective might help those who are alarmed at the consequences of the amendment to the Equality Bill passed in the House of Lords at the end of last month. The effect of it, if the Bill survives intact, would be to permit same-sex partnerships to be solemnised in Quaker meetings, Unitarian churches, and Liberal synagogues. Much attention was given last week to the fears expressed by the Bishops of Winchester and Bradford that clerics would be compelled to register civil partnerships, under threat of legal action for exercising discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation. Political parties are considering the possible con­sequences on votes in the forthcoming election. There is even a petition being got up to have the amendment thrown out.

Two points are perhaps worth bearing in mind…

The article mentioned in the leader Quakers seek liberty for gay couples is subscription-only until next Friday. So also are several letters, and a discussion of newspaper reports in the Press column.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Friday, 12 March 2010 at 9:40am GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England | equality legislation
Comments

This business got me re-reading Prof Lawrence Stone's absorbing book "Road to Divorce.England 1530-1987" which shows just what confusion and collusion the Established Church was prepared to live with in the past and how curious marriage law in England has been been. Nearly every change in the law tended to be met with alarmist reactions. Plus ca change.

Posted by: Perry Butler on Friday, 12 March 2010 at 10:06am GMT

May I add to Perry's comment my usual commendation of the excellent book 'Hanging in Judgement' by Harry Potter (really, he's a priest and a barrister) which documents the way in which the bishops used their position in the House of Lords to block attempts to abolish capital punishment?

Posted by: toby forward on Friday, 12 March 2010 at 10:52am GMT

Yes Perry Butler too true. And the C of E bishops blocked reform on the abolition of the Death Penalty. Thus leading to many unavoidable deaths.

But then 'it all began' with a certain king Henry...

Posted by: Rev L Roberts on Friday, 12 March 2010 at 12:38pm GMT

Synchronicity or what !


Toby Forward's comment had not been published when I wrote mine. I think there is something running deep here.

And what terrible wickedness it seems to us now. But to the bishops back then ? Were they subject to few 'bouts of Christianity' then ? Cf Barchester Chronicles.


May I add to Perry's comment my usual commendation of the excellent book 'Hanging in Judgement' by Harry Potter (really, he's a priest and a barrister) which documents the way in which the bishops used their position in the House of Lords to block attempts to abolish capital punishment?

Posted by: toby forward on Friday, 12 March 2010 at 10:52am GMT
Yes Perry Butler too true. And the C of E bishops blocked reform on the abolition of the Death Penalty. Thus leading to many unavoidable deaths.

But then 'it all began' with a certain king Henry...

Posted by: Rev L Roberts on Friday, 12 March 2010 at 12:38pm GMT

I have mislaid glasses and hope this is ok without ntheir aid.

Posted by: Rev L Roberts on Friday, 12 March 2010 at 6:17pm GMT

Simon. It could have been useful if the articles you have mentioned from the Church Times could have actually been made available for comment here. It seems that only subscribers are able to access the articles at the moment.

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Sunday, 14 March 2010 at 12:04am GMT

Ron, I did specifically state in the article that those items were currently subscriber-only. Normally I wait until items become free before linking, but on this occasion there was so much interesting material that I thought I would mention it sooner.

Posted by: Simon Sarmiento on Sunday, 14 March 2010 at 7:21am GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.