Wednesday, 24 March 2010

General Synod - questions and answers

The answers to the questions asked at last month’s meeting of the Church of England General Synod are now available.

Questions with Answers February 2010

Posted by Peter Owen on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 at 10:04am GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England | General Synod

The Archbishop of York's reply to question 53 is wildly inappropriate & I'm surprised that there hasn't been any comments about this. Suggesting that since some bishops have female employees then female concerns can thus be brought to the attention of the boys power club is a claim that the Archbishop needs to be called to account for. At the least he should apologize.

Posted by: Dennis on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 at 9:49pm GMT

Dennis, Thank you for your comment. I am hoping that the Archbishop of York was being thoughtless in his response rather than deliberately offensive, though I have to admit that I found his comments offensive.

Posted by: Anne Lee on Friday, 26 March 2010 at 12:33pm GMT

Having recently experienced the deep spirituality of the Archbishop of York during his visit to New Zealand, I do believe his heart is right. However, at this point in time - like the ABC - he is set in the mould of traditional English Church politics, which requires that the two English Primates try to engage with all sides of every argument in the Church world-wide.

I believe that both John and Rowan - together with the Primates in the US and Canada - have the most difficult task within the Anglican Communion, in terms of 'loyalty' to the established tradition, while yet trying to be open to 'what the Spirit is saying to the Church' at this time in history.

Contrast them with the likes of Orombi and Akinola and you have the difference between true Shepherds of all the sheep, and those whose pastoral responsibility stops at the gate of their own sheepfold. They need our prayers.

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Friday, 26 March 2010 at 6:31pm GMT

I'm not sure whether to regard it as ironic or tragic that the archbishop did/does not understand that his inability to differentiate between an advisor bringing an issue to the House of Bishops, or indeed a woman acting as secretary to the House, is not the same as hearing the views of senior women clergy in their own right. I seem to remember the bishops all getting very excited about the Indaba groups at Lambeth, but the lesson does not seem to have been applied once away from Canterbury. And that this might open the door to the need to listen to other groups that the House of Bishops is talking young people...or even.....!

Posted by: Rosalind on Friday, 26 March 2010 at 8:29pm GMT

Dennis, I'm surprised that there are so few comments here. I posted Question No. 53 along with Abp. Sentamu's response on my blog and received quite a few comments.

Posted by: Grandmère Mimi on Friday, 26 March 2010 at 9:22pm GMT
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.