Friday, 6 August 2010

Bishop Bennison wins appeal

Updated again Saturday evening
ENS reports Court rules in favor of Charles Bennison.

An ecclesiastical review court Aug. 4 ruled in favor of Diocese of Pennsylvania Bishop Charles E. Bennison with respect to two alleged disciplinary charges stemming from his response to his priest brother’s sexual misconduct some 35 years ago.

The decision by the Court of Review for the Trial of a Bishop is here… [PDF file]

Read the full article for the background to this decision.

The Standing Committee of the Diocese of Pennsylvania has issued a brief statement, and promised to say more soon.

Update see also An Invitation from the Standing Committee

The Living Church has Bp. Bennison Trusted the Canons.

Update See further ENS article, Standing Committee plans worship, ‘open conversation’ in wake of bishop ruling.

Other press reports:

Philadelphia Inquirer Episcopal bishop can return to head Pa. diocese

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Church overturns conviction of Episcopal bishop

Blog reports and comment:

Episcopal Café Bennison reinstated

Anglican Curmudgeon Court of Review Dismisses Charges Against +Bennison

Mark Harris Bishop Bennison guilty, but time ran out.

Gordon Reid Bishop Bennison wins his appeal

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Friday, 6 August 2010 at 11:06am BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: ECUSA
Comments

I honestly don't understand why the statute of limitations applies here. Surely someone who covers up for a sexual abuser is guilty of being an accomplice after the fact?

Posted by: Bill Dilworth on Friday, 6 August 2010 at 2:57pm BST

i am profoundly grateful at this result to appeal. stripping bishop bennison of his priesthood was way over the top, considering all the aspects of the offence.

Posted by: paul noonan on Friday, 6 August 2010 at 7:45pm BST

Bennison's summary that his actions were "just about right" which merited rebuke in the opinion that he was wrong in his actions entirely and his comparison now to his experience to the suffering of Jesus (in Living Church article) reveals a continuing self-justification and little comprehension of what he refused to see and covered up. Mark Harris is entirely right that he should resign.

Posted by: Rebecca Lyman on Saturday, 7 August 2010 at 12:17am BST

He has been thru so much. He must be exhausted.

What next ?

Posted by: Laurence Roberts on Saturday, 7 August 2010 at 10:50am BST

Generally, I feel So Good about us in TEC, that I may forget to ask...

...but PLEASE pray for us (esp. DioPenn).

Posted by: JCF on Saturday, 7 August 2010 at 10:04pm BST
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.