Saturday, 29 October 2011

Women Bishops - diocesan debate - 29 October

Updated to correct number of abstentions in house of laity
Updated to add texts of the following motions

Bath and Wells diocesan synod debated the women bishops legislation today.

The main motion, in favour of the legislation, was passed in all three houses. Here are the voting figures.

 ForAgainstAbstentions
Bishops2 0 0
Clergy52 9 0
Laity55 10 3

Twitter reports “Following [motion] on Archbishops’ amendment failed Following [motion] encouraging early Code passed”.

Here are the texts of the two following motions.

That this synod [ie the diocesan synod] request the General Synod to debate a motion in the following form:
That this synod [ie the General Synod] call upon the House of Bishops, in exercise of its powers under standing order 60(b), to amend the draft Bishops and Priests (Consecration and Ordination of Women) Measure in the manner proposed by the Archbishops of Canterbury and York at the Revision Stage for the draft Measure.
[defeated 21 votes to 100]

This Synod, supportive of women in the episcopate, urges General Synod to expedite the production of the Code of Practice by the House of Bishops and to take seriously its role in debating and approving the contents with due regard to those who find the consecration of women to the episcopate unacceptable.
[passed]

Posted by Peter Owen on Saturday, 29 October 2011 at 2:52pm BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England
Comments

Can anyone decode 'motion encouraging early code passed'? Is this about the Code of Practice, which of course, could turn into another Act of Synod (i.e. invented after the main legislation has been debated and passed and in practice significantly altering what the Synod thought it had just passed) if we aren't careful.

Posted by: Judith Maltby on Saturday, 29 October 2011 at 3:06pm BST

At Bath And Wells it was voted through in the spirit of 'let's get on with it' ie. not letting the Code of Practice become another complicated stalling technique.

Posted by: Claire Robson on Saturday, 29 October 2011 at 5:39pm BST

It beats me how anyone can vote about a Code of Practice when no-one knows what form it will take !

Posted by: Jane on Sunday, 30 October 2011 at 8:04am GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.