Friday, 7 September 2012

Dean of St Albans writes about same-sex marriage for Church Times

The following article was published last week in the Church Times, and is reproduced here by permission.

Time to tell the truth about gays

Same-sex marriage can be as holy and covenantal as the heterosexual kind, argues Jeffrey John

WHEN I was a teenager, I once plucked up courage to ask a vicar what he thought about the issue of gay relationships. After a long pause and a deep breath, he finally replied: “Well, Jeffrey my boy, I suppose we must try to keep an open mind about the whole filthy business.”

My early wrestling with the “gay issue” brought me to a conclusion that has never wavered. Unless you are genuinely called to celibacy, the God-given framework for being homosexual is the same as for being heterosexual: monogamy. It has always seemed obvious to me that being in a committed relationship with someone you love and trust to share your life with is likely to maximise the health and happiness of both of you. Yes, it is hard; yes, it can go wrong; but, whether we are gay or straight, most of us know it is the best bet, and want to live that way. At the purely practical level, marriage is good for everybody.

Those are the arguments that politicians use in favour of same-sex marriage, and they are good ones. But Christian theology has deeper reasons for saying that monogamy is good. When we love one another in a fully committed way, so that the love does not depend on eros, but on faithful self-giving to the other, then marriage reflects Christ’s union with the Church, and God’s with his people. Our covenant with each other reflects God’s own kind of covenanting love.

The fact that we are capable of loving as God loves us is the main reason why we say that we are made in God’s image. For most of us, loving someone in that way - the mystery of losing ourselves in love, to find a better self in union with another - is the best inkling we get in this life of the kind of ecstatic union with God which is what heaven will be.

This covenant theology of marriage does not depend on gender or childbirth. Even in Genesis, the reason why God makes Eve is because “God saw that it was not good for man to be alone.” When Paul talks about the theology of marriage, it is never with respect to childbirth. What matters is that the covenant between the couple reflects God’s covenant with us. That is why the Church has always married couples even where childbirth is impossible.

Theologically, ethically, and sacramentally, there is no difference between a gay couple and a heterosexual couple who cannot have children. So, yes, same-sex marriage can be as holy and sacramental as heterosexual marriage. Yes, God is in favour of gay marriage, and so should the Church be.

But, of course, it isn’t. In its reply to the Government’s consultation about gay civil marriage, the Church of England’s official spokesmen described same-sex marriage as a “hollowed out” version of real, heterosexual marriage. The obvious and insulting implication is that a gay marriage is empty, missing some all-important ingredient X.

Well, I would like to hear what that ingredient X is. I would like to know what is absent in my own relationship of 37 years, and in the relationships of thousands of other similar same-sex couples, which makes them “hollow” and deficient by comparison with heterosexual marriages. I have been observing all this for a long time, and I do not believe that ingredient X exists.

IRONICALLY, the Church knows more about homosexuality than most institutions. Most of the lifelong gay relationships I know are between Christians - many of them clerics. My partner and I met at theological college, where about three-quarters of the students and staff were gay (and the college was not unique in that respect).

Once the relationship began, I went to own up to the college principal, expecting to be thrown out. His response was: “Thank God for that. You’re such a bloody miserable academic introvert - loving somebody will make you a better person and a better priest.” They were the wisest words that I ever heard him utter. But, of course, they could not be said in public.

This is the real problem. For decades - perhaps centuries - the Church’s leadership has had a public attitude to gayness, and a private one. I have yet to meet a bishop or archbishop who, in private, is unsupportive, or seriously believes that such a relationship is a sin. The only sin is in telling the truth about it. Twice I have offered my resignation, in exasperation at all the lies, only to be told: “Don’t be naïve. We need honest chaps like you.”

It is obvious that a number of bishops are gay, and some are, or have been, in gay relationships, yet they constantly refer to gay people as if they were somebody else. For all the fuss that was made about Bishop Gene Robinson, there are probably more gay bishops in the C of E than in the Episcopal Church in the United States. The difference is that the Americans tell the truth.

Canon Giles Fraser put this nicely in a recent article. Mostly, he said, people complain that the Church does not practise what it preaches; but, on this issue, we do not preach what we practise.

THE Church possesses a gospel for gay people, but it cannot speak it openly to those who most need to hear. It cares too much about its own institutional politics to care about this large section of God’s people. It wants to keep the privileges of establishment as a Church for the whole nation, but, in order to appease its own extremists here and abroad, it demands exemptions from equality and human-rights legislation that everyone else accepts as common decency.

By opposing almost every advance that gay people have made since decriminalisation, and now by opposing same-sex civil marriage, it has turned itself into the enemy number one of gay people - despite its being one of the gayest organisations in the country.

This is a disaster for the Church’s mission, its integrity, and its morale. “A lying mouth destroys the soul,” Wisdom says. It is time for the truth that sets us free.

The Very Revd Dr Jeffrey John is the Dean of St Albans and the author of Permanent, Faithful, Stable: Christian same-sex marriage (DLT, new edition 2012).

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Friday, 7 September 2012 at 10:56am BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England | equality legislation

Sadly, in all of this, it is the hypocrisy of the Church that people of no faith are easily able to discern. We cannot hide the fact that there are already faithful monogamous relationships between people of the same gender in our congregations and in some more open parts of the Church, among our clergy. This fact is known to many of us.

For the Church to deny that such relationships are valid and blessed by God (when God is invited into them) is to deny their reality. This is hypocrisy. The sooner the Church admits that a monogamous loving relationship between two people of the same gender - who are otherwise, by law, allowed to be legally married - is in accordance with a biblical standard of fidelity, the better for all concerned

The integrity of the Church is at stake here.

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Friday, 7 September 2012 at 11:50am BST

"By opposing almost every advance that gay people have made since decriminalisation, and now by opposing same-sex civil marriage, it has turned itself into the enemy number one of gay people - despite its being one of the gayest organisations in the country.

This is a disaster for the Church’s mission, its integrity, and its morale. “A lying mouth destroys the soul,” Wisdom says. It is time for the truth that sets us free."

Truer words were never spoken.

Most other gay folk that I know see Christianity as a mortal threat, that the goal of institutional Christianity is to wipe them off the face of the earth through either "therapy" or through other more direct means (see David Kato, Fanny Ann Eddy, Daniel Zamudio, Matthew Shepard, or the victims of the Upstairs Lounge fire in New Orleans).
And the really sad part of it is that they are right. "Pray Away the Gay" is a euphemism for a faggot-free world (sorry Simon, I'm not softening this). Institutional Christians want nothing less than the total extinction of same sexuality, its cultures, its communities, its legacies, its people.

When I tell other gay people that I am gay AND Christian, as far as they are concerned I might as well tell them that I'm a Jew AND a Nazi.

The only way that I can make the Gospel speak to me and to others like me is to split it apart from the institution that claims the copyright on it.

And the really bitter irony of all this is that if there is anyone who knows in their flesh what it is like to be despised and rejected, acquainted with grief and esteemed not, it's gay and lesbian folk. Many of us have walked a real Via Dolorosa all the way to the bitter end, wondering why God has forsaken us as a crowd jeers at us as we die.

Posted by: Counterlight on Friday, 7 September 2012 at 1:43pm BST

Having struggled for many years since becoming a follower of Jesus, and being told that same sex relationships are wrong I have at long last used my own brain and searched for many months to conclude: "Who am I? to decide that another human being should not be allowed the same loving relationship as myself and my husband of 36 years.

Posted by: Deirdre Botsford on Friday, 7 September 2012 at 4:36pm BST

My oldest son has just started at his new school, which was founded 500 years ago by a Cathedral Dean. Every year there is a camp for new boys organised by the school Christian union which is usually extremely popular and attended by large numbers of new boys, regardless of faith.

My wife tells me that this year very few went. Certainly, we could not persuade my son to go. When my wife discussed it with other mothers, she was shocked by the level of outright hostility to Christianity which came across. She told me that Christianity seemed to be seen by the average class parent as hateful and disreputable; not a positive or even a neutral force.

I think the Church is misrepresenting the Gospel by focussing in the public square on issues of sexual morality; and I also think the Church's public positions on sexual morality are wrong, which makes this distortion worse. But I am also convinced that, as well as being misguided, it is also a major threat to the mission of the Church of England.

The major concerns of the Gospel are with the kingdom of heaven and, on earth, with love of our neighbour. The hard teachings of Jesus emphasised the poor, the downtrodden, the weak, the vulnerable, and the despised and persecuted. It is not only a travesty, but a tragedy, that we should now be preaching a Gospel of discrimination and rejection against a minority. Perhaps it is poetic justice that, as that minority finds its place in society, it is the Church which is punished for its lack of compassion.

So it is that Lord Carey includes in his list of "persecutions" to the European Court of Human Rights the case in which the Bishop of Hereford was found to have unlawfully discriminated against a gay job applicant. Lord Carey thinks that the BISHOP is the persecuted one. But surely it was the gay man.

Posted by: badman on Saturday, 8 September 2012 at 1:25pm BST

Couldn't agree more, badman.

I have a fair few gay friends and colleagues. Very few of them go to church. The rest despise the Church of England. They're right - at least as regards the handling of this issue by most high-profile Anglicans. I don't understand what has got into Williams and Sentamu over gay marriage. Quite apart from anything else - and of course there are many other things - it is so stupid.

Posted by: John on Sunday, 9 September 2012 at 3:24pm BST

"the case in which the Bishop of Hereford was found to have unlawfully discriminated against a gay job applicant. Lord Carey thinks that the BISHOP is the persecuted one. But surely it was the gay man."
- Posted by: badman on Saturday -

The whole affair sounds a wee bit like the story of Jesus' confrontation with the Scribes and Pharisees who wanted to stone the Woman 'taken in adultery'. Excepting that, this time, the 'woman' was a gay man who was 'stoned' by a bishop.

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Sunday, 9 September 2012 at 11:35pm BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.