Thursday, 29 November 2012

"Women Bishops - The Way Ahead"

Joint Press Statement From The Chairmen Of The Catholic Group And Reform in General Synod
also available here.

Women Bishops - The Way Ahead

The Chairmen of the Catholic Group in General Synod and the conservative Evangelical group Reform, who called for talks to break the deadlock over legislation to enable the consecration of women as bishops, have received acknowledgement of their request from the Archbishops of Canterbury and York.

Canon Simon Killwick (Catholic Group) and Prebendary Rod Thomas (Reform) have today further pledged themselves to do everything they can to ensure the speedy and safe passage of fresh legislation through the General Synod.

They said, “If agreement can be reached at round-table talks on fresh legislation which provides clearly and fairly for all members of the Church of England, there is no reason why fresh legislation should not be fast-tracked through the Synod before the next elections in 2015.”

The Synod’s Standing Orders only prevent the reconsideration of the same legislation during this period.

“It has never been our intention to prevent the consecration of women as bishops; our concern has always been for legislation which also made clear and fair provision for the substantial minority,” the Chairmen concluded.

The legislation which failed last week in the Synod would have had devastating consequences for the diversity and mission of the Church of England, had it been passed. We want the Church of England to continue to be a broad and comprehensive national Church.

Canon Simon Killwick
Prebendary Rod Thomas
(Chairman of the Catholic Group in General Synod) (Chairman of Reform)

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Thursday, 29 November 2012 at 10:59pm GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England | General Synod

It is good that both the Catholic Group in General Synod and Reform want "a broad and comprehensive national Church". I myself believe there should be room for differences even on matters which one side or other sees as fundamental - in the US Episcopal Church as much as in the Church of England. And it would be good if the few Anglo-Catholic dioceses in the Church of Australia, and my own radically puritan Diocese of Sydney would more readily allow for that breadth and comprehensiveness !

Posted by: John Bunyan on Friday, 30 November 2012 at 5:36am GMT

All very well but some of the Reform members in EGGS (GS evangelical Group) have made it clear they will vote against any legislation for WB as they see such a move as 'unbiblical'.

Plus, we have had these talks before - Rod and Simon know this all too well. Pressure groups do not represent all of GS. The place where such negotiating is done is in revision committees and in GS itself, not by unrepresentative off-line groups, valuable as these are in other ways.

And I'm a member of one such group, namely WATCH.

Posted by: Charles Read on Friday, 30 November 2012 at 10:41am GMT

"The legislation which failed last week in the Synod would have had devastating consequences for the diversity and mission of the Church of England."

Perhaps it is the legislation's failure that is having these devastating consequences right now.

Posted by: Jeremy on Friday, 30 November 2012 at 11:48am GMT

Charles; you're right; which is why Synod shouldn't be the playground of the groups but the place where their beliefs and theses are interrogated and tested by the mind of the whole church, such as it is.

Based on the voting patterns, the choice is a stark one, between accepting statutory provision or the long haul post 2016 (and, bearing in mind that the electoral college favours large parishes, with no guarantee that Synod's laity will not be more opposed on headship than now).

Posted by: Jonathan Jennings on Friday, 30 November 2012 at 4:17pm GMT
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.