Friday, 14 December 2012

Church and State – an idiot’s guide

In this week of the second Sunday in Advent, readers are invited to read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest this very helpful article by Frank Cranmer at Law & Religion UK.

Church and State – an idiot’s guide

It starts:

When matters touching on relations between religion and the state are discussed it not infrequently happens that the terminology becomes hopelessly confused and misused – sometimes by people who really should know better. So the following is a cut-out-and-keep guide to the absolute basics of Church and State.

First, there are four separate territories in the United Kingdom…

Posted by Peter Owen on Friday, 14 December 2012 at 11:23am GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church in Wales | Church of England | Church of Ireland | Scottish Episcopal Church
Comments

Thanks for 'Church and State-an idiots Guide', or as this Canadian boy would like to nickname it " A Hitchhiker,s Guide to Establsihment". Very helpful, especially given the articles in U.K. dailies about culture wars and cutting the C of E loose. Perhaps you could post a similar article about the arcane (it seems) working of C of E government. When people speculate on having parliament do something about women bishops, what process do they have in mind? Would parliament have to find a end run around the 1969 Synodical Provisions Act? Is such possible? Or tis there an "notwithstanding" clause in the GS legislation for such a scenario?

Posted by: Rod Gillis on Friday, 14 December 2012 at 3:20pm GMT

Damn: if only I'd thought of that title myself! My original preference was "Church and State for Dummies" but my co-blogger said that John Wiley & Sons is very protective of its titles - and I didn't fancy being sued.

Posted by: Frank Cranmer on Friday, 14 December 2012 at 7:06pm GMT

Rod Gillis, the UK Parliament is absolutely sovereign and can do whatever it wants. The Measure process is one special way to legislate, but Parliament always retains the power to legislate in the normal way.

Posted by: Christopher on Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 12:09am GMT

Thanks Christopher, the supremacy of parliament aspect I understand. Canada has a Westminster system of government of course ( subject to some qualifications with regard to The Charter of Rights and Freedoms). So, I would expect that Parliament could in the end introduce and pass legislation. My question is more about the politics of just how that might come about on an issue like this. For example, would parliament be inclined to consider legislation if say, a majority of the C of E bishops asked it to? Or, is there any kind of standing legislation, for example in the 1969 measure, that forsees and provides a remedy for this kind of situation? Or if parliament took up the issue unilaterally , are there enough bishops in the Lords to block the same? I'm trying to get a handle on just how prospects for parliament's intervention might happen.

Posted by: Rod Gillis on Saturday, 15 December 2012 at 3:38pm GMT

I think what you're asking about is Realpolitik.

From a strictly parliamentary point of view, there certainly aren't enough bishops in the Lords to block legislation: 26 of them in a House of 600+. I think Parliament would be very reluctant to impose its own view by legislation even if a majority of the House of Bishops asked it to.

The Commons debated this last Wednesday. It might help to have a look at the Hansard or (if you can't quite face that) read the summary on my blog.

Posted by: Frank Cranmer on Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 12:02am GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.