Thinking Anglicans

CofE bishops criticise government welfare reforms

Updated Tuesday
The Archbishop of Canterbury has written this further comment (item dated 11 March): Universal and specific.

From the website of the Children’s Society:
Archbishops and bishops unite with charity in child poverty call

Dozens of Church of England bishops, including the Archbishops of Canterbury and York, have joined The Children’s Society to call for urgent steps to prevent hundreds of thousands of children being plunged into poverty.

The welfare benefit up-rating bill – currently before parliament – will limit the amount by which most key benefits and tax credits can rise each year to only 1%, regardless of how much prices increase. This is well below the rate of inflation predicted by the Treasury, and the government estimates this will push 200,000 more children into poverty.

We have joined forces with bishops in the House of Lords to table amendments which would remove support paid for children from the bill. Peers are set to debate these amendments when the bill reaches report stage in the Lords (on 19 March)…

From the website of the Archbishop of York:
Archbishops Call For Vulnerable To Be Protected In Welfare Benefit Up-rating Bill

So far 43 Bishops have signed an open letter backing The Children’s Society campaign (the Archbishops of Canterbury and York are prevented from signing open letters or backing campaigns by convention).

Archbishop of Canterbury: Archbishop joins urgent child poverty call

News reports of this:

Telegraph Edward Malnick Archbishop of Canterbury attacks Government welfare reforms (scroll down for the actual text of the letter)

BBC Archbishop of Canterbury condemns benefit changes

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Laurence Roberts
Laurence Roberts
11 years ago

Gospel / Go(o)d work for sure and worth more than millions of sermons and pious handwringing.

Cynthia
Cynthia
11 years ago

Yeah, it’s nice to see them get down to the real business.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x