Thursday, 9 May 2013

Update on Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill

Updated Friday evening

From here:

The Bill has been carried over to the 2013-14 session. The Bill is due to have its report stage and third reading on 20 and 21 May 2013.

A list of proposed amendments and new clauses has been published.

New copies of the bill and the explanatory notes are published here (the bill has a new serial number).

And a further amendment here.

David Pocklington has now written at Law & Religion UK about the Redefinition of Marriage – New Clause 9. The whole article, although long, is worth reading.

…MPs David Burrowes, Tim Loughton and Jim Shannon laid the New Clause 9, nine-point amendment on 12 March this year, which calls for a referendum “on the issue of same-sex marriage”. The critical part is the question that is to appear on the ballot papers, viz.

“At present, the law in England and Wales defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Should the law be changed to define marriage as the union of two people—whether a man and a woman, or woman and a woman, or a man and a man?”, [emphasis added].

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:00am BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: equality legislation

Thanks Simon for posting these links. The proposed amendments are quite modest. The leaders of the anti-SSM MPs, acting as a group, have tabled a set of amendments calling for greater protection for religious objectors in various roles, including as civil registrars. (The govt will certainly resist the one on registrars). They also table an amendment calling for the act not to be implemented unless a referendum is held first and the people vote Yes.

On the other side, the main amendment is one calling for humanist ceremonies to be recognised, as they are in Scotland.

Posted by: Iain McLean on Friday, 10 May 2013 at 9:47am BST

From the very own lips of those who are opposed to Same Sex Marriage it has been confirmed that the majority of the British Society are not worried about Gay Marriage. Those worried and promoting a hate filled propaganda are the religious fanatics and their politician allies, all of them added together are a tiny minority of the British population. As a British citizen, what I hear people mostly worried about is the Economy and controlling Immigration. If you ask me a migrant , I will tell you that I don't think Britain is full for anyone to suggest closing the borders, but I do think the Government should do more to create jobs and force the lazy spongers to work and earn their living.

Posted by: Davis Mac-Iyalla on Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:25pm BST

Opening civil marriage to same-sex couples does not redefine marriage any more than allowing mixed-race couples to marry did. Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, and Uruguay--as well as 11 states and the District of Columbia in the United States--have already opened marriage to all couples regardless of the legal sex of the spouses. It is time England modernized. To think that England used to lead the world in legal matters.

Gary Paul Gilbert

Posted by: Gary Paul Gilbert on Monday, 13 May 2013 at 10:47pm BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.