Monday, 9 December 2013

More analyses of Sharpe v Worcester DBF

Our previous report is here.

The Church Times carried a detailed news report by Gavin Drake but this is available only to subscribers.

Frank Cranmer has published the more detailed analysis that he promised, see Clergy employment and Sharpe v Worcester DBF.

Two other articles have been published:

Philip Jones has written The Removal of an Irremovable Pastor: Sharpe v Diocese of Worcester. He argues that it is impossible for the holder of a freehold office to bring a dismissal claim of any kind in an employment tribunal.

Neil Addison writes that Anglican Vicar May be an Employee.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Monday, 9 December 2013 at 10:52pm GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England | equality legislation

A very good summary from Mr Jones.

You just fall into the hole in the thinking he conjures.

But as I read this there is a course open that is left is to argue that the failure to protect the Rector amounted to constructive dismissal. Or have I missed something ...

Posted by: Martin Reynolds on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 at 9:40am GMT

This judgement is reasonably clear for a legal argument. What is also clear is that this is unlikely to be the final word on the case.

Posted by: Rev John Smallwood on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 at 1:37pm GMT
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.