Wednesday, 12 February 2014

General Synod - Wednesday

Order paper for the day

Official summary of the morning’s business: General Synod - Wednesday AM

Official summary of the afternoon’s business: General Synod - Wednesday PM

Press release on the environmental issues debate: General Synod re-affirms the Church of England’s commitment to play a leading role in the effort to prevent dangerous climate change

Press release on the girl guides promise debate: Synod approves motion to support girl guides promise action

Posted by Peter Owen on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 at 1:12pm GMT | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Church of England | General Synod

Synod can pass whatever motions it likes. In the promise, God is dead, and for as long as that god is seen as endorsing sexism and homophobia, odds are he'll stay that way.

Posted by: James Byron on Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 12:58am GMT

Where can we find the answers to the questions about Pilling which were asked on the order paper on Monday?

Posted by: Richard Ashby on Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 12:41pm GMT

There was a significant exchange during the questions after the presentation of the Pilling report, which doesn't seem to have been picked up on. An early question asked if it could be made clearer what was deemed to constitute homophobia, and what was not. Then Philip Giddings asked if the facilitated conversations would always include someone who had experienced same-sex attraction but had subsequently been 'liberated' from this condition. I hoped that either Sir Joseph or +Sheffield would rebuke Giddings and tell him that what he had just said was a clear example of homophobia (and that he should repent!), but I was disappointed on both counts.
It all goes to show that Giddings, with his extreme views, is not a suitable person to be chair of the HoL during these difficult conversations.
When Christian Concern published their comments on the Pilling report, and referred to 'facilitated conversions', we all laughed and thought it was a typo. I'm not so sure now!

Posted by: Malcolm Dixon on Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 12:49pm GMT

The fact that Dr. Giddings question was allowed to receive any sympathetic hearing - especially when the British and American societies of psychological discipline have questioned the validity of such claims for 'reparative treatment' for intrinsically gay or lesbian people - is astounding.

It appears that Dr. Giddings has very little real understanding of the etiology of homosexuality, and it is sad that the the General Synod of the Church of England has such representatives among its governing bodies that could influence synodical determination on this important issue.

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Friday, 14 February 2014 at 11:32pm GMT
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.