Friday, 14 April 2017

With the devil on your back

“It’s hard to dance with the devil on your back.” So wrote Sydney Carter, in a song which will be sung across the country today. (It’s also the fifth most popular copyrighted song in school assemblies according to CCLI.)

Carter himself called it “pretty far flown, probably heretical and anyway dubiously Christian,” and expected opposition. There’s some truth in his comments — it could be variously labelled as syncretist, universalist, Platonist and several other -ist’s as well — but the numbers tell their own story.

A lot of that is down to the catchy Shaker tune, but the gentle cynicism about the establishment and expansive cosmic vista catch the mood of the times too. What it nearly misses is the agony. “No real people were hurt during the writing of this song.” Nearly — if it wasn’t for the line I began with, where the real struggle shudders through.

And on Good Friday, it must. We’ll sing “Lift High the Cross”, but be careful to balance it with “it causes me to tremble.” We cannot sustain the pretence that Easter has not already happened that the liturgy properly invites; but we dare not pretend that Easter was and is without cost.

For me this Easter some of that cost and contradiction is personal — my father died just a few weeks ago. But it is also ecclesiastical. Strong feelings are swirling around us. Ten bishops out of ten would like to tidy them up. But the lesson of a certain un-noted report was that feelings like these are not to be tidied or managed but lived alongside. We will find God’s good future for us with them, through them, not by burying them and thinking they’re gone. The bench too will have to learn new ways of modelling and leading unity which do not bury its own diversity: something I’ve seen beginning in my days in the House and College, but something we still have to explore further and very tenderly together.

What this mustn’t be, though, is a surrender to the short-cuts of post-truth politics or populist power. If the dance of God is to go on, the choreography of the Kingdom requires all of us to be on the floor, sharing in the exacting task of listening, looking, learning, following, leading — in a pattern that will look very broken if part of it is missing. We will actually need each other to make it work.

As well as doing plenty of personal processing today, then, I’ll also be bringing some very different sorts of friends with me in my mind to the Cross, each of whom has a piece of my heart, acknowledging their hopes and their hurts, sensing the limb-breaking tensions, feeling the weight of the devil on all our backs that would seek to pull us apart: but feeling too the unstoppable rhythm of the dance that will go on.

David Thomson is Bishop of Huntingdon in the diocese of Ely.

Posted by David Thomson on Friday, 14 April 2017 at 7:00am BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: just thinking
Comments

Thank you Bishop David for your thoughtful and positive words. Especially your comments on the House and College of Bishop being honest with the diversity amongst themselves. Something that has been lost under the present Primates.
Your words give us hope in a true body of Bishops wording together, each contributing their own thoughts and views with honesty, and without fear of Big Brother acting like a CEO.

Fr John Emlyn

Posted by: Fr John E Harris-White on Friday, 14 April 2017 at 12:09pm BST

This was a really helpful piece, reminding us that managerial solutions will not 'magic away' the deep differences we have within our Church.

"The bench too will have to learn new ways of modelling and leading unity which do not bury its own diversity."

Absolutely. We need greater transparency and honesty about the fact that in the Church of England a wide diversity of views are held in good conscience.

It is not enough for 'spokespeople' to tell the media 'The Church of England believes this...' when half the Church doesn't. It is not enough for an episcopal collegiality to project a common view, when actually there are huge differences of opinion among the bishops.

It is not just a case of Bradwell and Buckingham being dissenting voices. In privacy and confidentiality other bishops confide differences so wide, and dissent from the 'official' bishops' report, that it's hard to see where things go in the future.

Whether we 'manage' a supposed 'status quo' not endorsed by many bishops and priests, in order to 'maintain unity' in the Communion; or trigger schism if compromises alienate conservative ones, the truth is that we are diverse, we are Christians, and the key issue - as Bishop David highlights here is: shall we not find love and grace to keep living and working and serving Christ alongside one another?

"We will actually need each other to make it work," complete with our 'hopes' and 'hurts', and our 'limb-breaking tensions'. In many ways, living together is maybe part of the Cross. Whether we face our own selfishnesses, or 'the devil on all our backs that would seek to pull us apart', Christian unity is so easy to break and divide but there is also the call to live alongside, in tensions, in complexities, in uncomfortable love.

Paradoxically, perhaps we grow in love and grace individually and as a Church, through this need to co-exist with one another, and always, always love and care and seek each other's flourishing.

Posted by: Susannah Clark on Monday, 17 April 2017 at 11:02am BST
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.