Comments: Tutu speaks out on Guantánamo

Thank God for Desmond Tutu! Not all African clerics are backward!

Posted by Kurt at Friday, 17 February 2006 at 3:49pm GMT

Now there is a great Anglican and African--I have admired and looked up to the Archbishop since the days when he lived under apartheid. His is probably one of the first if not the first Anglican face I ever saw.

Thank God!

Posted by RMF at Friday, 17 February 2006 at 5:53pm GMT

Kurt, that sort of attitude is not going to win us any *more* friends in Africa.

By all means, praise God for the faithfulness of God's servant, +Desmond---and pray that we ALL, of whatever continental origin, may follow +Desmond's example (even as he follows Christ's).

[Heh: fully noting that in this case, +Desmond is *not* being a friend to my nation's current regime---God bless him for it! :-D]

Posted by J. C. Fisher at Friday, 17 February 2006 at 6:45pm GMT

"White House spokesman Scott McClellan on Thursday rejected the call to close the camp, saying the military treated all detainees humanely."

The U.S. Christian Right still rallies around their 'godly' President George W. So do many of the 'reasserting', traditionalist Episcopalians. George W meets with Network bishops, like +Bob Duncan and Keith Ackerman. Those who are most upset about ECUSA's more tolerant stance in relation to gays and lesbians see nothing wrong with the Bush Administration's rendition program, which 'outsources' torture, prisoners being held at Guantanamo indefinitely as long as the U.S. is at war with Islamic terrorists, and wire-taps of U.S. citizens' communications without a court order in violation of U.S. laws. Their 'godly' President is above the law and all international conventions to which the U.S. is a signatory. Americans, who take an opposing view, are aiding and abetting the enemy, revisonists, and denying the divinity of Christ. Unfortunately, those allied with ++Abuja and his cohorts conveniently overlook the fact that commitment to human rights for all people is deeply rooted in an incarnational theology, which has always been the hallmark of Anglican theology.

Posted by John Henry at Friday, 17 February 2006 at 7:53pm GMT


I'm not convinced that some comments which seem to me to be outrightly racist deserve to be published on Thinking Anglicans. I'm sure it is an area to which you have given some thought - given the fact that this forum has recently become so full of lively debate. May I urge you to take some action.



Posted by Andrew Carey at Wednesday, 22 February 2006 at 2:47pm GMT

Can you be more specific please? I can't spot what you are referring to.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento at Thursday, 23 February 2006 at 1:02pm GMT
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.