Comments: no news

But now there is news: no agreement was reached. That was not a surprise, of course. Some at the table wanted an arrangement that involved leaving the Episcopal Church de facto but not de jure. Others at the table wanted them to remain in the Episcopal Church, hoping that would continue talking and listening. There was no new word from Canterbury: Canterbury does not have authority to resolve this across the boundaries of an existing province.

I fear Ms. Gledhill's "source" led her astray, expressing the source's own wishes as if they were accomplished facts. I do agree that there are those at the radical pole of Episcopal politics who want resolution as much as those at the reactionary pole (although I don't think their numbers are as great).

In the meantime, we are still waiting to see what these "alternative-seeking" bishops will do, how the Episcopal Church will respond, and who will support whom.

Posted by Marshall Scott at Wednesday, 13 September 2006 at 4:28pm BST

And now, some hours later, there are some official statements from ACNS. Nothing has happened.

Posted by ruidh at Wednesday, 13 September 2006 at 5:35pm BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.