Comments: Questions and Answers

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

As the press release suggests, this is an experiment so part of me thinks I should let the Synod decide for themselves whether they think it is useful or not.

Having said that, surely this mode of operation is not just about doing things better internally but also about making Synod's work more publicly visible and accountable? That means they should be taking into account the views of others... like me! :-)

What makes me really scratch my head is why was it done and the way in which it was done. As for the why? I can applaud the Synod's desire to make use of technology but is a virtual question time the thing to which they should be giving priority? I, for one, would put streaming the actual Synod debates at a higher priority and I'm sure others could think of other examples. Synod members themselves might prefer use of online facilities to avoid the mass of paper they get for each group of sessions.

On the method - an RTF file? A stream of questions with no kind of navigation? I do sometimes wonder whether those doing all this are listening to anyone with any web nous. If you are going to do something 'virtual' at least do it properly.

Posted by David at Tuesday, 14 November 2006 at 9:48pm GMT

*Two* (of only 25) questions regarding "the advertisement placed by the Gay Police Association in The Independent headlined “In the name of the father”"?

Methinks some CofE'ers need to get over themselves, and get a life! ;-/

Posted by J. C. Fisher at Tuesday, 14 November 2006 at 11:24pm GMT

The two questions were both from the same person, so it's really only one question...

The advertisement mentioned did occasion quite a stir when it appeared. See for example
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/6060738.stm

Posted by Simon Sarmiento at Wednesday, 15 November 2006 at 1:14pm GMT

Sarah Dylan Breuer posted an article about one of these questions (and I made a comment in response) see
http://www.sarahlaughed.net/gracenotes/2006/11/lest_we_think_i.html#comments

Posted by Simon Sarmiento at Wednesday, 15 November 2006 at 1:18pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.