Comments: GS: Wednesday press reports

Bishops raid misssion funds for palaces
****************************************

Now, why does not this surprise me ?

Wh, having a form of godliness deny the power thereof.

The C of E shows no interest in the message of JESUS or radical discipleship--- and this is what you get.

Bishops seem to me to be an expensive and unnecessary 'luxury' for God's people.

Posted by Laurence Roberts at Wednesday, 28 February 2007 at 11:49am GMT

SO glad to read, in the american link here, that Paul Perkin has nothing at all against gay relationships themselves--- but simply wishes to up-hold the distinctiveness of marriage, and to avoid confusion.

Posted by Laurence Roberts at Wednesday, 28 February 2007 at 12:12pm GMT

What Paul Perkin of Reform demands of the Church of England is no different from what his allies demanded of the Episcopal Church at Tanzania.

At this point, I don't think we are going to comply.

If you don't want to see your church subjected to this sort of thing, you can join us.

The Episcopal Church welcomes you. Even you, Ruth Gledhill.

Posted by Charlotte at Wednesday, 28 February 2007 at 12:55pm GMT

As my last remark might have been a bit opaque, see Kendall Harmon's article on "closing the loophole" which, previous to Tanzania, had allowed unauthorized blessings of same-sex unions to take place in the Episcopal Church: http://titusonenine.classicalanglican.net/?p=17915#comments

and Ruth Gledhill's "the C of E is definitely in trouble" comment is at http://timescolumns.typepad.com/gledhill/2007/02/venables_predic.html#more

Posted by Charlotte at Wednesday, 28 February 2007 at 1:11pm GMT

"A Church House spokesman said upgrading bishops' houses was part of the Church's overall mission effort." What can one say? The sort of statement that helps bring many things into focus.

Posted by Lapinbizarre at Wednesday, 28 February 2007 at 1:54pm GMT

The UK government have also recently let it be known that they want to retain seats for CofE Bishops in the revised House of Lords (=US Senate)... another comfortable reason to not rock the establishment boat.

Oh for some uncomfortable Bishops!

Posted by Dave at Wednesday, 28 February 2007 at 2:23pm GMT

Now if the upgrading to episcopalaces were to ensure carbon-neutrality or better I would applaud it. And then they might think of getting out of the dark ages with other church plant.

(keeping posts rare as a Lenten discipline)

Posted by Mynsterpreost (=David Rowett) at Wednesday, 28 February 2007 at 10:37pm GMT

"Now if the upgrading to episcopalaces were to ensure carbon-neutrality or better I would applaud it."

I say! Are they still burning coal in Barsetshire? Try Puritans and Primitive Methodists instead - much more clean-burning!

"And then they might think of getting out of the dark ages with other church plant."

And again I say 'I say!' Do you really heat churches in England?

Posted by Steve Watson. at Thursday, 1 March 2007 at 11:31am GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.