Comments: Lambeth 2008: Church Times reports

This just keeps me in giggles...

http://pluralistspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/01/has-lambeth-2008-nicked-unitarian-logo.html

Posted by Pluralist at Friday, 25 January 2008 at 2:44am GMT

Once again, his arrogance has moved the would be pope to overplay his hand, alienating countless conservatives.

Liberals in the church can count our blessings that the faux-orthodox movement has fallen under the sway of so feckless a fraud.

Posted by Malcolm+ at Friday, 25 January 2008 at 6:27am GMT

The GAFCON leadership have released the following:

This morning we have released the following communication on behalf of the leadership team of GAFCON:

"We have heard that GAFCON has aroused considerable interest and enthusiasm. We would encourage those who are planning visits to the Holy Land to coincide with GAFCON to await the announcement of the venue and the exact start and finish dates before making final plans"

The GAFCON Leadership Team.

Posted by MJ at Friday, 25 January 2008 at 10:13am GMT

The event is less than six months away and the GAFCON planners still do not have a firm venue and dates?

I've run science-fiction conventions with better planning than that.

Posted by Pat O'Neill at Friday, 25 January 2008 at 11:19am GMT

"On the subject of homosexuality, Dr Williams said that the agenda included a day set aside to consider “sexuality questions as they affect the ministry of bishops”, part of which will be the results of the listening process asked for by the Lambeth Conference in 1998."

Reading that last part, I get the image of a bunch of schoolboys called before the teacher trying to explain why they haven't done their homework.

Posted by Ford Elms at Friday, 25 January 2008 at 11:40am GMT

"There will not be a resolution on the subject.” Can the Archbishop, given the ground-rules of the conference and his personal authority, be certain of this, , or is there a possibility of an "unofficial" resolution being introduced during the conference?

Posted by Lapinbizarre at Friday, 25 January 2008 at 2:40pm GMT

I do find it perplexing that the duly & regularly elected, approved, consecrated, canonical Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New Hampshire is not invited (because "some people" would find his presence objectionable), but the inhibited former bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin is still in. This "some say" construction is regularly used by the propaganda network, "Fox News," to report complete lies. Such a discreditable approach simply should not be the sort of criteria applied in making decisions at the highest levels of the Communion.

Posted by Prior Aelred at Friday, 25 January 2008 at 4:05pm GMT

I too find +Robinson's exclusion painful. There seems to be an on going attempt at self exclusion by Gafcon and a primatal attempt at obligatory exclusion of all conflict from a very expensive episcopal meeting, Refusal to meet, to discuss, to find a 'middle way' characterises many of the peace making efforts in the Middle East during the past and present centuries. If deeply religious and sincere Christians are unable to see that they are already united in Christ's love for each one of them what hope is there that an imposed glue of Law will hold us together. Only Love will.

Posted by baglady at Saturday, 26 January 2008 at 4:58pm GMT

sexuality questions as they affect the ministry of bishops”,

Isn't that special? I lie awake at night fretting about how issues of sexuality affect the ministry of bishops.

In this, as in many other pronouncements, it appears that Rowan's answer to the catechism question, "Who are the ministers of the Church?" is a simple one: Bishops are the minsters of the church.

Us laity and priest 'possums need not worry about the church; the bishops will take care of everything.


Posted by Cynthia Gilliatt at Monday, 28 January 2008 at 1:39pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.