Comments: formal statements listed

Suggestions for possible inclusion next time you update:

South Carolina Bishop
http://www.dioceseofsc.org/news/elslettr2.htm

West Texas Bishops
http://titusonenine.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_titusonenine_archive.html#106918882759315686

Dallas Bishop
http://www.bishop.jmstanton.com/JMS_Statement_031103.htm

Posted by kendall Harmon at Saturday, 22 November 2003 at 2:31pm GMT

I do not understand the rationale behind posting responses from "lobbying groups" and not individual diocesan and episcopal responses. It would seem that our ecclesiology should privilege the responses of bishops and their dioceses above those of lobbying groups, whether progressive/revisionist, confessing/traditional, or other.

Simon replies: it is purely pragmatic, I do not have time to deal with diocesan or other responses below the level of province. At the time I started out, however, nobody else was collecting lobbying groups, so I started doing that.

Posted by Todd Granger at Monday, 24 November 2003 at 2:52pm GMT