Comments: ACNA: another critical view

An interesting read. I still find it odd that "autonomy" and "interdependence" are set off against each other as opposed notions, whereas, if I recall correctly, the phrase that emerged in the discussion process leading to Windsor and the Covenant was "communion with autonomy and accountability." Interdependence does not mean submission. It is a two way street: the pledge is for us to bear one another's burdens, not control each others' lives. (See Covenant 3.2, which calls for mutual respect, not control.) So this means, perhaps that the Communion will need to put up with gay bishops in one province, while the province with a gay bishop may have to accept that this means less participation in certain forums, particularly by that bishop -- and to learn to stop stamping its feet and complaining.

Posted by Tobias Haller at Tuesday, 9 February 2010 at 2:52pm GMT

I have a different interview, which might be more revealing:

http://pluralistspeaks.blogspot.com/2010/02/bishop-bootslick-on-wednesday-vote.html

Posted by Pluralist at Tuesday, 9 February 2010 at 5:55pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.