Comments: WATCH responds to Monday's debate

"Compromise?" Well, I notice traditionalist objectors will not be executed . . . yet. Is that compromise by WATCH's standards?

Posted by WannabeAnglican at Tuesday, 13 July 2010 at 4:55pm BST

Hysterical hyperbole much, Wannabe?

I confess that, before I read WATCH's statement, I really couldn't decipher just what HAD been decided by the GS!

Posted by JCF at Wednesday, 14 July 2010 at 4:56am BST

The text of this press release is gibberish.

WATCH needs a new editor, or a new press-release writer.

Posted by Jeremy at Wednesday, 14 July 2010 at 2:11pm BST
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.