Comments: House of Laity Meeting on Monday

That's a real shame. Dr Chadwick is one of the few who could speak up for what are much-needed reforms.

Posted by Anglican Observer at Tuesday, 8 February 2011 at 8:14pm GMT

Seems, from Julian's input, that the 'powers that be' behind the House of Laity of General Synod in the Church of England may have wrongly arranged their tactics on this occasion. Straight- forwardness is alway a boon to the democratic process, and for the Secretariat to use their own influence to bring about a 'desired result' is not always a good idea.

The members of the House of Laity themselves ought to be the ones deciding on whom to vote into any special role on one of the commissions in which they have any participatory role. Perhaps this incident may have served the desirable purpose of warning the 'powers that be' that manipulation of a desired outcome is never a good idea.

Posted by Father Ron Smith at Wednesday, 9 February 2011 at 7:50am GMT

What a nice piece, so well reasoned and well presented.

I too feel sorry for Dr Chadwick - but the House acted well, the mandarins etc do not come off so well ....

Posted by Martin Reynolds at Wednesday, 9 February 2011 at 9:23am GMT

Some of you may remember that Sir Humphhrey Appleby was virtually always able to manipulate matters so that the bureaucrats got the outcome they sought. Many fans of the series doubtless recall that Prime Minister Hacker (as he was by that point) eventually started to win with some regularity.

From time to time, bureaucrats need to be reminded that they are there to serve, not to govern.

Similarly, it a good thing to remind the bishops in their shovel hats as well.

There seems to be a heavy layer of arrogance among Church of England and Anglican Communion bureaucrats. One hopes this will be just the first of many examples of belling Sir Humphrey.

Posted by Malcolm French+ at Thursday, 10 February 2011 at 1:21am GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.