Comments: General Synod - Wednesday business

May I suggest that those working on the alternate baptismal language refer to the baptismal rite in the 1979 BCP of the Episcopal Church? I find it moving and poetic, but still in modern language.

Posted by Pat O'Neill at Wednesday, 9 February 2011 at 9:22pm GMT

Very pleased to see that the attempt to sabotage the reception of the ARCIC report by the imposition of a reference to the 39 Articles into the reponse was rejected by the Synod.

Posted by Richard Ashby at Wednesday, 9 February 2011 at 10:00pm GMT

In fact the reference to the 39 Articles wasn't rejected. That amendment was just never reached.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento at Thursday, 10 February 2011 at 6:36pm GMT

Good to find that the ARCIC process has not been completely derailed by the nonsense of the new Ordinariates. A.C.s who have moved in that direction may find it a bit suprising that there are many of us (A.C.s) who still have some sort of affinity with Rome - despite her sontinuing stance against the ordination of women.

It is just a pity that the Anglican Shrine of Our Lady at Walsingham is still implacably opposed to allowing A.C. women clergy (yes, there are some)
to celebrate Mass there. Future Mariological studies might well centre on 'The Priesthood of Mary' - whose act of 'bringing forth' Christ in her womb is not too different from any other woman 'bringing forth' Christ at the altar.

Some of us pro-women A.C.s still have difficulties with the Roman dogma of Immaculate Conception for Mary herself (and the consequent idea of her sinlessness) - while yet accepting that the Immaculate Conception was of the Christ in her womb.

Interestiing, too, is that fact the the C.of E. have virtually translated the Feast of the Motherhood of Mary, on August 15th, the same day as Roman Catholics celebrate her Assumption. I have no problem with the idea of the Assumption of the BVM - especially when one considers the translation in similar fashion of the OT Prophet Elijah. Is the Mother of God not just as worthy of this dignity? The dignity of women in the Church ought be no less than that of men.

Posted by Father Ron Smith at Thursday, 10 February 2011 at 9:24pm GMT

Re: Interestiing, too, is that fact the the C.of E. have virtually translated the Feast of the Motherhood of Mary, on August 15th, the same day as Roman Catholics celebrate her Assumption.

I don't know about the C. of E. per se, but my Episcopalian church (of strong A/C tendencies) celebrates the Feast of The Assumption on August 15th, not some nebulous 'Feast of the Motherhood of Mary'. I much prefer it when Episcopal parishes call the feast its real name, 'Assumption'.

Re: Is the Mother of God not just as worthy of this dignity?

Very true, Fr. Smith. For reasons unclear to me, the liberal materialists as well as the neo-calvinists seem to have a irrational aversion to honouring the Mother of God.


Re: Some of us pro-women A.C.s still have difficulties with the Roman dogma of Immaculate Conception for Mary herself (and the consequent idea of her sinlessness)

I don't find it at all difficult to believe that Mary was sinless, with respect to original as well as to personal sin.

Posted by Hector at Saturday, 12 February 2011 at 5:27am GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.