I've not double-checked the spreadsheet - but it looks as if the overall number voting against has now overtaken those voting for the covenant. Some seem to feel that the overall figure is significant.
Looking over the overall numbers, has anyone an explanation for the extraordinary results in Derby?
Not only did the bishop vote no to the covernant, but only one priest and only two lay members voted yes (possibly one lay member and two priests -- my memory is a bit hazy).
And has anyone got a list of the bishops who voted no -- which diocesans and which suffragans?
It does NOT always rain in Manchester - at least, not on this parade. Deo gratias!
Peter, unless there has been a change of date that I haven't been told of yet, I have S&N diocesan synod in my diary for Saturday, 21 April rather than Thursday, 12th.
I'm just back from holiday, so I'll contact the diocesan office tomorrow to check.
I am sure you are correct, particularly as the S&N diocesan website gives the date as 21 April. I have corrected the date above.
I originally took the date from a secondary source.
Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.
Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to
the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill
the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select
'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No
third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical,
advertising, or other purposes.