Comments: Women Bishops: news and comment

I don't necessarily hold a candle for Tony Baldry M.P. but I think the Bishop of Buckingham is being more than a little harsh on the Member of Parliament for Banbury in criticising him for sporting a Garrick Club tie. As Vice President of SEONS (The Society for the Elimination of the Open Neck Shirt) I commend Mr. Baldry for his elegant neck wear when so many under his leader's example choose to dispense with this fashion accessory.
The bishop goes on to say "It's probably a one clause measure within two years or curtains for the establishment." Some do say that the rot set in when Constantine established the Christian religion as the official religion of the Roman Empire.
Much rather to say cheerio to the Church of England as the Established Church of this nation than farewell to being a serious branch of the One Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church!

Posted by Father David at Friday, 30 November 2012 at 9:54pm GMT


Perhaps the "One Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church" should listen much more closely to Jesus when he condemns the established church for excluding people. Is it possible that after all these centuries, bigotry that is clear to many, has been elevated by MAN as divinely ordained?

Is it possible that you are creating God in your image rather than seeing all people as created in the image of God?

Posted by Cynthia at Friday, 30 November 2012 at 10:35pm GMT

This is a couple times I've noticed it now (in the Paul Obi piece), Nigerians referring to the Bishop of Canterbury. Technically true of course, but I notice that Primate Paul Obi didn't publish under a lesser title of "vicar." I wonder if there's a language agenda going on, or maybe it's just their usage.

Posted by Randal Oulton at Saturday, 1 December 2012 at 3:01am GMT

+Liverpool bang on the nail ... the arguments demeaning women are bound in a terrible continuum to violence against them.

Posted by Rosemary Hannah at Saturday, 1 December 2012 at 8:47am GMT

I notice that the Nigerian comment contains the error that the House of Laity voted AGAINST the legislation. There is also a rather snide insinuation that Sentamu was not advanced to Canterbury for, shall we say, less than honourable reasons. Not a nice piece.

Posted by cryptogram at Saturday, 1 December 2012 at 12:11pm GMT

On the Nigerian reaction we should remember that perception is reality. "There is also a rather snide insinuation that Sentamu was not advanced to Canterbury for, shall we say, less than honourable reasons." - cryptogram

When we have not "Thinking Anglicans" but "Thoughtless Factions" campaigning publicly on the basis of "Anyone but Sentamu" than they can hardly express surprise when accused of racism.

Posted by John Waldsax at Saturday, 1 December 2012 at 1:32pm GMT

"we should remember that perception is reality" John Waldsax

Is it? So if someone is not selected for a job for some reason entirely unconnected with his/her ethnic origin but a third party thinks it is connected with their ethnic origin, then it *is* racial discrimination? This reminds me of a business setting where it was attempted, very unfairly, to measure customer satisfaction by how long customers thought they had queued rather than the objective reality of how long they had actually queued. There really isn't a lot you can do about what goes on in people's imaginations but dignifying false perceptions by calling them reality is rarely helpful.

Posted by Laurence C. at Saturday, 1 December 2012 at 5:37pm GMT
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.