Thanks for 'Church and State-an idiots Guide', or as this Canadian boy would like to nickname it " A Hitchhiker,s Guide to Establsihment". Very helpful, especially given the articles in U.K. dailies about culture wars and cutting the C of E loose. Perhaps you could post a similar article about the arcane (it seems) working of C of E government. When people speculate on having parliament do something about women bishops, what process do they have in mind? Would parliament have to find a end run around the 1969 Synodical Provisions Act? Is such possible? Or tis there an "notwithstanding" clause in the GS legislation for such a scenario?
Damn: if only I'd thought of that title myself! My original preference was "Church and State for Dummies" but my co-blogger said that John Wiley & Sons is very protective of its titles - and I didn't fancy being sued.
Rod Gillis, the UK Parliament is absolutely sovereign and can do whatever it wants. The Measure process is one special way to legislate, but Parliament always retains the power to legislate in the normal way.
Thanks Christopher, the supremacy of parliament aspect I understand. Canada has a Westminster system of government of course ( subject to some qualifications with regard to The Charter of Rights and Freedoms). So, I would expect that Parliament could in the end introduce and pass legislation. My question is more about the politics of just how that might come about on an issue like this. For example, would parliament be inclined to consider legislation if say, a majority of the C of E bishops asked it to? Or, is there any kind of standing legislation, for example in the 1969 measure, that forsees and provides a remedy for this kind of situation? Or if parliament took up the issue unilaterally , are there enough bishops in the Lords to block the same? I'm trying to get a handle on just how prospects for parliament's intervention might happen.
I think what you're asking about is Realpolitik.
From a strictly parliamentary point of view, there certainly aren't enough bishops in the Lords to block legislation: 26 of them in a House of 600+. I think Parliament would be very reluctant to impose its own view by legislation even if a majority of the House of Bishops asked it to.
The Commons debated this last Wednesday. It might help to have a look at the Hansard or (if you can't quite face that) read the summary on my blog.
Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.
Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to
the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill
the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select
'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No
third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical,
advertising, or other purposes.