What will be at stake, in the legislation, obviously, is the position of those in the Church of England who ‘in conscience’ do not believe that women can exercise a priestly or episcopal ministry in the Church, but who still wish to be part of the Church of England.
The C.of E.’s canonical position has been to accept women’s ministry – albeit, in the past, with the proviso that those objecting will be provided for by bishops who also object to the validity of women clergy in the Church of England. One wonders on what particular theological basis this can be any longer sustained.
Now is surely the time when the House of Bishops, and General Synod, should stand by the courage of their convictions – and by the manifest desire of the majority of the Church – go ahead with legislation for women bishops , unimpeded by any measure that would in any way inhibit the authority of such bishops operating by the same principles as those of their male colleagues, as is proper to a truly collegial House of Bishops.
Furthermore, such legislation should make redundant any idea of the special provision of episcopal oversight for those who refuse to recognise female episcopal oversight. The whole idea of a two-tier college of Bishops is repugnant to catholic order, and should not be encouraged to remain part of the episcopal oversight of the national Church of England.
will be praying for you all, so much at stake.
Thank you for this excellent website - only recently discovered. For years I have wished there was a good periodical, akin to the Tablet, which could publish thoughtful articles by the laity, as well as the vital papers you yourselves have gathered here. I hope this is read by the keepers of this site!
As regards equality of opportunity in the Church for women, the House of Bishops must, in my view, take the lead, and bite the bullet (before the July synod).If not,their lordships' credibility will be fatally undermined. Yours sincerely, H.F.T.(Miss)
> The whole idea of a two-tier college of Bishops is repugnant to catholic order
In the view of many, the whole point of introducing women bishops is to *overthrow* Catholic order!
I see the hat. I don't yet see the rabbit.
Forget romantic notions of 'catholic order' -what it may be - and get on with pragmatic on the ground solutions to ordained ministries.
"[T]he whole point of introducing women bishops is to *overthrow* Catholic order!"
Indeed let us overthrow discrimination.
Who are these 'many' who want to 'overthrow Catholic order'?
I don't think I've come across anyone who has expressed that motivation. Those who don't care much about 'Catholic order' don't worry much about it one way or the other. Those supporters of women bishops who do care do not consider that it breaks 'Catholic order'. That just leaves those who care about 'Catholic order' and are opposed to women bishops -- and I would think that most of those would concede that the motive of 'overthrowing Catholic order' is not primary.
This American Anglican considers any argument over whether women should be bishops as undisputedly silly. Not only do we consecrate women as bishops, they also practice law, medicine and accounting as well as dig ditches. You should pass this legislation, the sooner the better, with NO exception for those who don't "accept" female clergy. If God chose a woman to bring Jesus into the world, a woman can be a bishop!
Why are some people hung up on "Catholic order???" What the heck does it mean? We are a small c catholic church, not large C Catholic. I was raised Greek Orthodox before becoming part of TEC as an adult. As an outside observer of the Reformation and the RC's arcane policies on women and birth control, I can't imagine why folks in the CoE would get so worked up about "Catholic order."
By the way, I'm actually Anglo-Catholic, we have liberal ones in the US. The crux of A/C being the belief in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist and a beautiful liturgy surrounding that Great Mystery. It has nothing to do with Rome and the pope. Are there strains in the CoE that actually care about Rome?
Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.
Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to
the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill
the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select
'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No
third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical,
advertising, or other purposes.