Far too little, far too late.
What's up with the Churches ?
The way they treat their lgbt - and CONTINUE to, is dreadful.
Non-religious lgbt wonder why any lgbt bother with religion - they may have a point...
Maybe Pope Francis has influenced this Province. Our diocese has several priests in same-sex civil unions, most of which are very long-term, 10 years or more, and the priests are highly regarded.
They sign up to the Covenant and then make a move like this!
I think that, for a Province on the Continent of Africa, the Southern African Anglican Church is moving in a good and wholesome direction. It is seeking to operated in the world of reality - rather than the 'virtual world' of the GAFCON Provinces.
In common with former Archbishop of Capetown, the Right Reverand Desomnd Tutu, the Anglican Church in Southern Africa is seeking to bring justice to the minority community of people who happen to have been created in the Image and Likeness of the very same God who created the majority homosexual community. Same God, same children of God!
One can only hope that the GAFCON Trumpet sound at Nairiobi might give way to the clarion call of the Gospel of Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, who came into this world to save sinners - all of us!
Peter:Maybe Pope Francis has influenced? explain.?
All I know is that before divorce and re-marriage became a free fo all in he Church Of England they blessed re-marriages for years. A similar pattern could be emerging here.
Don't they have full marriage equality in SA? If so, why the weak response to "skim milk" civil unions?
etseq, I believe the Civil Union Act _is_ SA's form of marriage equality. It's a bit convoluted and not my region but AIUI there are three laws under which South Africans get married. One is applicable only to heterosexual couples, one only to members of certain indigenous tribes, and one is the Civil Union law, under which any two adults can marry. AFAIK there is no difference in benefits or nomenclature - people are free to refer to their relationship as a "marriage" or a "union" regardless of which law they were married under (this is in contrast to the American political landscape where it's explicit that civil unions ≠ marriage). It's just that each "path" to marriage is governed by a different law. I know it sounds odd; someone on the ground there can set me (erm) straight if I'm off base.
I suppose you could argue it's not "true" marriage equality until same-sex couples (or white people, for that matter) have the same three-way choice of which law they wish to marry under, but it's a fine distinction to me.
Interestingly a comment not picked up at the time of the recent Welsh vote ( and bring forth no reaction!) but recorded in the Church Times...Archbishop Morgan affirmed that the Welsh hierarchy was quite happy with gay clergy couples ( and lay ministers ) as long as thay were in a civil partnership. This was in response to a question about sexual morality and practice, so there was no pretence to celibacy. Maybe the Anglican Church in Southern Africa is headed in the same direction?
Good evening, I know it is some years since these posts were questioning matters; has the Anglican Church in South Africa produced a new Theological Report since the " The Church and Human Sexuality" of the CPSA in April 1995. If yes, where may I obtain subsequent documents? Many thanks. Fr Garth Petzer
Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.
Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to
the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill
the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select
'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No
third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical,
advertising, or other purposes.