Comments: Legislation on Women Bishops Becomes Law at General Synod

I'm still sat in the chamber Whatsapping.

As a friend of mine with whom I should disagree Whatsapps back to me, "War is over. Let's win the peace. Xxx"

Posted by JTO at Monday, 17 November 2014 at 4:51pm GMT

At last! In 1965 in the old Church Assembly the issue of women priests and bishops was raised and defeated.Slowly and steadily those of us in favour pressed on. 25 years ago , the day the Berlin Wall came down, Synod gave Provisional Approval to a Measure legislating for women priests. This was finally approved in 1992. The first women were made priest in 1994. Now 20 years later and 25 years after the Wall came down we have full approval of women bishops! No one can say the Church of England does things in a rush!
Many of the early protagonists like Professors Lampe and Nineham and lay women like Valerie Pitt and Christian Howard have died. I hope they are having a wonderful party in Heaven.

Posted by Jean Mayland (Revd) at Monday, 17 November 2014 at 8:12pm GMT

It will be interesting to know (and in the interests of openness and transparency that are supposed to accompany appointments these days we ought to know) where each diocesan bishop has got to in the process of filling these vacant suffragan sees, the more so as from yesterday a male only shortlist is hardly appropriate going forward. Dunwich is presumably on hold until the new diocesan is named; Plymouth (the longest vacancy) is presumably also complicated by Exeter having a new diocesan and may be considered also to have the special characteristic of a history of traditionalist bishops. Stockport is the next longest vacancy and one might suppose that the Bishop of Chester has waited. Hull is a more recent vacancy, which puts the spotlight on Hertford. It is one thing for the new Bishop of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich to be the last bishop appointed under the former rules, it is quite another for a suffragan to be selected from a male only shortlist after 16 November.

Posted by Anthony Archer at Tuesday, 18 November 2014 at 4:05pm GMT

At a meeting to discuss the legislation in Chester diocese, I asked the Bp of Chester if they were going to delay, I got the impression he wanted to hurry with the Stockport appointment but he didn't commit himself. Maybe he also has certain con evo parishes in this half of the diocese breathing down his neck?

Posted by robert marshall at Wednesday, 19 November 2014 at 12:24pm GMT

If the Bishop of Chester shortlisted and made the decision before 17 November then I will let him off!

Posted by Anthony Archer at Wednesday, 19 November 2014 at 9:14pm GMT

Shouldn't Grantham now be added to the list of vacant suffragans as it seems from what has been written on the Lincoln Diocesan website to have been restored? I'll wager a shilling that the next + Grantham will definitely be a woman.

Posted by Father David at Thursday, 20 November 2014 at 5:29am GMT

The last Bishop of Plymouth was "traditionalist" but neither of the two previous ones.

Posted by Priscilla White at Thursday, 20 November 2014 at 6:56pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.